Talk:Velocity Tower

Sheffield Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sheffield, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sheffield on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SheffieldWikipedia:WikiProject SheffieldTemplate:WikiProject SheffieldSheffield articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Start‑class Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Velocity Tower is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Changes Following new design

There is a couple of new designs for this going around, both have a second tower, at 18 storeys, and one shows the main tower at 36 storeys, whilst the other only 30. Should the articles be amended to Velocity Towers in the light of this, as I feel since it is the same development, the smaller tower is not notable enough for its own article. L.J.Skinner^{wot|I did} 11:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the two towers are going to be connected at the lower levels (2-3 floors) so this should still be considered 1 building. I'm not sure at this stage if the developers are going to rename it to Velocity Towers, I imagine they'll keep the existing singular title since one will be much larger than the other. --Benchamoneh (talk) 12:43, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done a bit of research on this project and updated the article as necessary. At 17 storeys the new tower is only classed as a 'mini' tower by the developers and so I wouldn't think it warrants it's own article either. --Benchamoneh (talk) 16:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Velocity Tower and the List_of_tallest_buildings_in_Sheffield

Can anyone with accurate information about Velocity Tower see my notes on Talk:List of tallest buildings in Sheffield

--Waugh Bacon (talk) 19:55, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I want to order your BY fromd6.27 to 9.7 Lyumeiyiz (talk) 07:56, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Velocity Tower/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires addition of further inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Requires copy edit for WP:MOS

Keith D (talk) 10:54, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C class as article has info box + photo, and tells what and were by whome.
agree better refs required.

Article is never going to be much bigger without filling with non enclyclopedic content.

- BulldozerD11 (talk) 14:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 14:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 09:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)