Talk:Vandenberg Space Launch Complex 3

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Rocketry Mid‑importance

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

California Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Military history / Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

History is lacking

The article seems to be missing pre-1999 history. What happened with SLC-3 prior to 1999 when Atlas came to SLC-3E, and sometime a bit later when Falcon 1 briefly used SLC-3W? N2e (talk) 01:36, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A map would be useful

A map showing the relative positions of the various launch complexes at Vandenberg would be a useful addition to the article. N2e (talk) 19:32, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps, showing the relative positions of the various launch complexex, be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in California may be able to help!

Is Space Launch Complex 3-West still active?

Since SpaceX no longer uses SLC-3 West and will be using a newly renovated SLC-4 for its Falcon 9 launches starting in 2012, should SLC-3 West be considered inactive? user:mnw2000 00:24, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is already listed as inactive? Where is the problem? --G W… 08:20, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- At the Vandenberg Air Force Base article, the chart lists it as active:

Active sites

Site	Status	Uses
Space Launch Complex 2	Active	Delta II, previously Thor, Delta
Space Launch Complex 3-East	Active	Atlas V, previously Atlas II and Atlas
Space Launch Complex 3-West	Active	Falcon 9,^[1] Falcon Heavy^{[citation needed]} previously Atlas, Thor, Falcon 1 (pad configured; never launched)
Space Launch Complex 6	Active	Delta IV, previously Athena, Shuttle (unused), Titan III (unused)
Space Launch Complex 8	Active	Minotaur
Launch Complex 576-E	Active	Taurus.^[2]

References

^ Simburg, Rand. "SpaceX Press Conference". Retrieved 16 June 2010.
^ NASA.GOV - 2009 Highlights for 2009 Orbiting Carbon Observatory(OCO) satellite.

Falcon 1 history

This paragraph has been in the article for some years, and tagged for a citation for 5 years. (Full disclosure: I may have been the one who requested the citation quite some time ago.)

I have no problem with the removal; I remove unsourced stuff from Wikipedia very regularly.

However, I may have found a source for this when I recently read the biography of Musk by Ashlee Vance. I don't have a copy available right now, so can't confirm. Therefore, I'm just placing the deleted paragraph here, for future ref if we can find a source.

Several test firings of the Falcon 1 were accomplished before SpaceX discovered that due to the overflight risk they would not be allowed to launch from SLC-3W while launch vehicles were standing on adjacent launch sites.^{[citation needed]} As one of the adjacent sites was at the time occupied by a "pad queen" (a launch vehicle that sits on its launch pad for months or years before launch) the restriction caused SpaceX to abandon SLC-3W and instead develop their Omelek Island launch site for Falcon 1. SpaceX co-founder Elon Musk has stated that no compensation was paid to SpaceX over this issue.{{Citation needed|date=September 2010}}

Cheers. N2e (talk) 05:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding is that the issue in 2005 was with the payload of the final Titan IV, not the launch vehicle itself. Since Titan already had its payload, the AF wouldn't let F1 fly until after the Titan launch was complete and the Titan IV retired. That pushed the first launch of F1 from Vberg to Omelek. They had no intention of abandoning Vberg, but the AF and LM were looking to force the F1 launch site farther away from the Atlas 5 pad, to SLC-4, which is what happened. So the problem wasn't that they couldn't launch with other vehicles on nearby sites, it was specific to the final Titan IV, and combined with a forced move to SLC-4. My citation-fu fails me at the moment though and it was simpler to remove the paragraph A(Ch) 06:30, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, my momory is fuzzy on the detail as well, and I think it was best to remove the paragraph. I'll get my hands on a borrowed copy of the Vance book again later this summer and will try to update the situation and cause if the source is sufficient.

One other thing for us to keep in mind, we may have somewhat different statements on "the cause" in different sources. Moreover, there may always be a stated cause that may, or may not, be identical to the actual cause, given markeitng and the interests of various parties. E.g., while it is convenient for a governmental organization to say "of course we could not take the risk" with our gabillion-dollar super-valuable payload, there have by now clearly been a number of reliable sources on some USAF insiders simply not wanting new competition for the existing incumbents in the US space industry. So we have to be open to all, and of course use phrasing that doesn't say more than our source (when we locate it again) actually supports. But you definitely did the right thing: removing the statement until it is sourced. N2e (talk) 14:32, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and there was also a lot of speculation that LM wanted SpaceX moved to SLC-4 because they wanted to keep SLC-3W free for a potential second Atlas pad. I found a reference relating to the pad issues, but but unfortunately it doesn't contain many details or outcomes (eg: did the government pay SpaceX for their move to SLC-4?)^[1] A(Ch) 19:39, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Editorial: Lousy Planning". 2005-08-22.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Vandenberg AFB Space Launch Complex 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080502021721/http://ap.google.com:80/article/ALeqM5iREy1ROPlY2e5lcvGv7971nK0s2gD8VCHE800 to http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iREy1ROPlY2e5lcvGv7971nK0s2gD8VCHE800

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Vandenberg AFB Space Launch Complex 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spaceflight which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:30, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[sxpc20100616-1] Simburg, Rand. "SpaceX Press Conference". Retrieved 16 June 2010.

[2] NASA.GOV - 2009 Highlights for 2009 Orbiting Carbon Observatory(OCO) satellite.

[3] "Editorial: Lousy Planning". 2005-08-22.

[1]

[2]

[1]