Talk:Unpleasant odor
Appearance
This is the talk page of a redirect that has been merged and now targets the page: • Odor Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Odor Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
What about?
[edit]What about ACRID and PUNGENT?" Ipsofacto (talk) 14:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
It would be a better idea to merge than to delete this page if you think it is a fork. Consider placing {{merge|Odor}} at the top of the page, then starting a discussion. Shaliya waya (talk) 19:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, if you agree the topic isn't notable by itself, it would take just a few minutes to move any appropriately referenced material to the respective pages at odor and body odor, and perhaps redirect this to odor? Sasata (talk) 19:25, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- I am not in favor of the merge myself, but if someone else wants to suggest it, it is up to them. I believe this page has to potential to be expanded well enough some day that it would be clearly suitable for its own page, but I have not worked on it myself very much since creating it, only because I have been busy with other things. Shaliya waya (talk) 01:10, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Merge Into Odor
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result was merge into Odor. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:46, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Doesn't seem important enough to stand alone, how about a merger? Tofutwitch11-Chat -How'd I do? 20:43, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- Delete unsourced and completely uninformative Little Professor (talk) 11:50, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
- Keep immature but distinct enough as a subclass to warrant it. 174.101.57.241 (talk) 04:57, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.