User talk:Ipsofacto

Welcome!

Hello, Ipsofacto, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Edcolins 18:48, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Bemuso-3 Bemuso.com - specifc permission to use diagrams.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bemuso-3 Bemuso.com - specifc permission to use diagrams.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Bemuso-A.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bemuso-A.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot (talk) 18:06, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

helpme

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

Please reopen the helpme once you ask the question. Cheers, Jaakobou^{Chalk Talk} 13:00, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

please let me know how to change the title of a topic; especially change from 'franchising' to 'franchise', Thanks. ````ipsofacto````

You simply "move" the article to the correct name. There should be an option, just to the left of the search box, with a dropdown list and a few options, one of which is move. If this isn't clear, let me know and the name of the article and I'll do it for you.--SPhilbrick T 14:32, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Guarantees and warranties

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Guarantees and warranties. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Warranty. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Warranty - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Ipsofacto (talk) 13:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

   on the talk page of the author.

There is an implied notice that I am copying from other pages in Wikipedia in construction of my subject. The subject I am working on is not found in Wikipedia. The article is going to be about "process" warranties and how they are best expressed in engineering contacts ( also,not on English Wikipedia" with methods of calculating them. I may make reference to Wiki-articles or consult them so that I do not repeat their message.

I have conributed several articles starting 2006-7 and the article " Royalties" -about 85k in length - has received B in quality and a high "priority" from Wiki editors. I have also worked on the Royalties page in the last few days and am also constructing "Technology alliances and Partnerships", a portion of which is almost repeated by Wikipedia in the Royalties page.

I have also consulted with UNIDO and developed the information I am contributing here.

I hope I am Clear. Ipsofacto (talk) 13:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Franchising

Thank you for the additions you are making. Please be aware though that, no matter what your personal expertise is, wikipedia articles must be made verifiable by the citation of published reliable sources. In the case of the Franchising article, the generally sad state of the article might be misleading, but the policy is still applicable. If you need help with the mechanics of citing sources please don't hesitate to ask. User:LeadSongDog come howl 06:02, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I welcome your comments! If 30 refs are not enough, the original article should take its place. If the article 'in sad shape' help to improve it. May be there are editors or robots who can do this. Please let me know how a citation differs from a reference. I see it in no other article. If the article is repulsive of your sentiments, please remove it and do the readers a favor.Quoting from on a Wipedia 'citation' is: - Citation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Broadly, a citation is a reference to a published or unpublished source (not always the original source). More precisely, a citation is an abbreviated ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation - Cached - SimilarIpsofacto (talk) 15:01, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Joint venture

Hello. I was looking over your contributions to joint venture. I deleted the sentence in the introduction which stated that joint venture is a company acting under company law, as joint ventures aren't necessarily companies. Also the bit about Chinese law is minutia and probably shouldn't be included in the introduction. Perhaps you could put the latter in another section? Finally, I'm not sure some of the sections are necessary within the Wikipedia article. The article's intent should be to describe joint ventures as a legal and economic entity, but some of the sections make it seem like a how-to on getting a joint venture started, which isn't very encyclopedic. Let me know what you think. Thanks Oore (talk) 12:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Oore for your comments. Before you put in your version of the JV, please note that the term is mostly used now in India and China (which make up half the world!)and is starting to make inroads into Africa. It was originally used in the USA and almost stopped after WWII. England and France consider the term included in Company Law and not separate from it. In fact they frown on it in seminars. Please check the point. You are using the term loosely and perhaps with the American (ancient) perspective. China is the only country which has defined the JV and has a JV Law and hence the detail. The country is growing and needs foreign help in technology and management. So too India and Africa. The Indian Government permits such association ( I should know) and independent existence (so too China now, WFOE). If a JV is formed following the contours of the JV, it has to be in China, India and Africa (mostly). They will model it in time. The US and UK are not yet seeking Indian, Chinese and African technology, but they will. The article is written to aid further investment in China, India, Brazil and Africa where investments are flowing. I appreciate that the UK and the US are in dire need of funds. They will get some through said JVs. If you have deleted any sentences in my original article, please provide a reference but not your reasoning. I am sorry if I sound caustic but you are talking to an Expert. At the same time, you are welcome to delete the whole article and do Jimmy Wales a favor! Ipsofacto (talk) 14:40, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Close paraphrasing

Hi. I'm afraid the Royalties article you contributed to may be a copyright infringement of [1], since the text is closely paraphrased. While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation – including both structure and language – are. For an example of close paraphrasing, consider the following:

This high proportion is because new products require "basic foundation development" (R&D, refining/defining business processes and more.).

The article says:

This high proportion is because new products require "basic foundation development" (R&D, refining/defining business processes, etc.).

There are other passages that similarly follow quite closely.

As a website that is widely read and reused, Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously to protect the interests of the holders of copyright as well as those of the Wikimedia Foundation and our reusers. Wikipedia's copyright policies require that the content we take from non-free sources, aside from brief and clearly marked quotations, be rewritten from scratch. So that we can be sure it does not constitute a derivative work, this article should be revised to separate it further from its source. The essay Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".

Please let me know if you have questions about this. --Chealer (talk) 22:50, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Bemuso-A.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bemuso-A.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:57, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Bemuso-B2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bemuso-B2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:58, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]