A fact from United States Army Replacement and School Command appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 October 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
ALT1: ... that the United States Army Replacement and School Command reached its peak in May 1945 with 481,000 personnel? Source: "At the time of its organization, the Replacement and School Command consisted of about 166,000 officers and men, but by the end of 1942 it had grown to 226,000 and by May 1945 it reached its peak with 481,000 persons assigned and attached, including trainees." https://history.army.mil/html/books/104/104-9/CMH_Pub_104-9.pdf
Overall: Hmm, I could approve ALT1 but I'm not sure if it is the most interesting one. ALT0 is currently lacking a citation directly after the sentence (at the end of a paragraph does not suffice per the rules), but it's rather uninteresting imo. However, I see another possible hook with this sentence: Tony Cucolo notes that the men who trained at IRTCs replaced the dead: "The men trained here knew they were going to the deadliest places on the WWII battlefield." That would lend a more grim aspect to the history. Maybe in combination with ALT1, it would give meaning to the large number of personnel. What do you think about it? –LordPeterII (talk) 16:32, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this is all fair enough. (The other thing in the back of my mind was that maybe the picture wasn't interesting enough.) I think we can put Cucolo's comment in Wikipedia voice without any trouble, and so get:
@StAnselm: Well, the picture might not be the most interesting one, but I can approve it. There's no guarantee any hook will get a picture spot because only one in eight can, so it's a little down to luck if this will appear. I have amnended a "pictured" to ALT2 anyway in case this would happen. And yes, I like ALT2 better.
StAnselm - Can a citation be added to the sentence "Other commanding generals included Harold R. Bull and Harry Hazlett." before this is promoted please? I did check the citation of the preceding sentence but it did not seem to contain the relevant information. CSJJ104 (talk) 23:59, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]