Jump to content

Talk:Ugolino della Gherardesca

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge

[edit]

Ugolino and Dante basically covers the same content, relating Ugolino's life in history and legend. Str1977 (talk) 09:01, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ugolino della Gherardesca. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:37, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Scientific analysis of the remains" confusion

[edit]

The line "In 2008, Paola Benigni, superintendent to the Archival Heritage of Tuscany, disputed Mallegni's findings in an article, claiming that the documents assigning the burial to Ugolino and his descendants were Fascist-era forgeries" doesn't make much sense. Paola isn't disputing Mallegni's findings, which were that the bodies he found are of a father and his kin that are very probably of the Gherardesca family, nor does the assertion that the burial documents were forged have anything directly to do with Mallegni's findings. I don't even know how to word the problem with the quoted line; it just sounds off. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.60.202.174 (talk) 04:03, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]