Talk:Udine

Italy Mid‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Google Earth Location

GE geo location is wrong.. about 20kms too east 83.190.236.154 07:04, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Friuli-Venezia Giulia-Stemma.png

Image:Friuli-Venezia Giulia-Stemma.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its population was 100,032 in 2012, and that of its urban area was 176,000.

what does "urban area" mean? why no reference about? population amount with no source too — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.51.236.89 (talk) 19:17, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Name section

I've restored the name section [following its deletion on 13 December 2012‎ by the anonymous user at 173.34.56.21] on the article because it's well supported by scholarly references (in fact, it's better referenced than the rest of the article). Please feel free to add additional sources. Doremo (talk) 17:57, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to challenge the scholarly material as "superflous information and unsubstantiated hypothesis," please discuss it here with other editors before removing it again. Doremo (talk) 18:00, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]