Jump to content

Talk:Typhoon Vicente

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peak intensity

[edit]

Per the Prognostic Reasoning For Typhoon 09w (Vicente) Warning Nr 13, "Vicente rapidly intensified from 75 kts to a peak intensity of between 115 and 120 kts." I am therefore i am proposing that for the infoboxes we use 118 kts since it is in between both intensities until the best track analysis is released sometime next year. Comments?.Jason Rees (talk) 23:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. I think we should just put 115 kt in, since we know the winds were at least that strong (and category wise on SSHS it doesn't change). I think it's best to keep the units rounded, so unless we get confirmation that it should be 120 kt, I think 115 would suffice. Also, that was the advisory intensity. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:12, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your whole argument evovles around 115 kts being the warning intensity, except in their amended warning the JTWC went with 120 kts, so i still think 118 kts is the best idea. As for keeping the units rounded does it really matter as in Aus at times we have to use non rounded knots to make the infoboxes correct.Jason Rees (talk) 02:12, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, could you show me a link for that warning? I must have missed it, sorry. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:21, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I used to use 120-knot, later 115-knot, but now 120-knot again. 118-knot is really not proper at all, as the JTWC never used it. -- Meow 15:59, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
118 knots may not be proper since the JTWC never used it, but it is a good comprise until the best track is released especially since "Vicente rapidly intensified from 75 kts to a peak intensity of between 115 and 120 kts.". In prose i reccomend that we use the wording "Vicente rapidly intensified from 75 kts to a peak intensity of between 115 and 120 kts."Jason Rees (talk) 16:06, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why 118 knts? That is kinda random. Use the most reliable of the two. YE Pacific Hurricane 16:35, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
118 kts is not random it is the mid point between the two peak intensities used by the JTWC, as for using the more reliable one I seriously think its best that we go for a mid point.Jason Rees (talk) 16:40, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

JTWC prognostic reasonings──Vicente

[edit]

For reference

01 // 02 // 02 // 04 // 05 // 06 // 07 // 08 // 09 // 10
11 // 12 // 13

--✯Earth100✯ (talk✉) 05:43, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Typhoon Vicente (2012). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:46, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Typhoon Vicente (2012). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:53, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Typhoon Vicente (2012). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:17, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 October 2016

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as proposed. SSTflyer 07:43, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Typhoon Vicente (2012) → Typhoon Vicente – Name was retired N-C16 (talk) 02:56, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Typhoon_Vicente&oldid=1211145143"