Talk:Typhoon Oliwa

Typhoon Oliwa has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 13, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
April 25, 2010	Featured topic candidate	Promoted
January 21, 2024	Good topic removal candidate	Demoted

Current status: Good article

Weather: Tropical / Eastern Pacific / Western Pacific Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as Low-importance).

JMA

Add information on what the JMA did during this storm.Jason Rees (talk) 00:01, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Oliwa (1997)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jason Rees (talk) 22:41, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prior to that time, Oliwa co-existed with a weak tropical cyclone that formed in a similar location in the southern hemisphere.

Whilst i know this to be true, it would be nice to try and ID which SPAC cyclone it was. Also i would change the Southern hemipshere to South Pacific and change link it off to the season.

I would like to see some more impact from Japan There seems to be quite a bit in on Google - Also see if theirs anything in the HKOs report for the season.

Bar that everything else seems to be in order.Jason Rees (talk) 22:41, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since all my comments have been addressed im happy to pass this article

Button templates

The two button templates seem pretty bulky and unnecessarily cumbersome. Since I can't think of any good way to combine them, would everybody be OK with just removing the EPAC one? This storm was primarily a WPAC typhoon. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 18:49, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really OK. It was named in the CPAC, and the button bar is especially important since it's part of a featured topic candidate. I'm not sure how to fix the problem, however. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:17, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just because it was primarily a typhoon it still was part of the 1997 PHS. Leave Message, Yellow Evan home

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Typhoon Oliwa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929102835/http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/jma-eng/jma-center/rsmc-hp-pub-eg/Besttracks/bst1997.txt to http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/jma-eng/jma-center/rsmc-hp-pub-eg/Besttracks/bst1997.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]