Talk:Typhoon Lynn

Typhoon Lynn has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 2, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Lynn (1987)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 02:30, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written:

After several grammatical adjustments, the article now complies with MOS policies on grammar, layout and structure. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 02:34, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article contains a sizable bibliography of reliable publications. No signs of original research; the sources are made frequent use of in the text. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 22:36, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article provides a thorough supply of encyclopedic information on the topic. Nothing looks to be trivial. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 22:34, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article presents its coverage of the topic in a neutral tone. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 22:32, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

According to the revision history, the article has not suffered from any disruptive editing in all its current existence. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 17:13, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

The article's three images are all validly licensed, and all serve relevant purposes for illustration. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 17:14, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Though it has taken a lot longer than I should have let it, after reading the article over twice for good measure, and checking it against the criteria, I am satisfied it qualifies for GA-status. Congratulations! One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! (talk) 02:37, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Typhoon Lynn (1987). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://baseportal.com/cgi-bin/baseportal.pl?htx=/miso/typhoons&cmd=list&range=100,20&cmd=all&Id=103

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:37, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]