Talk:Typhoon Faith

Typhoon Faith has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 29, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Faith/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 06:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria

Well-written:

With the issues below addressed, the article complies with MOS policies on grammar, as well as structure and general layout. Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 08:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article has plenty of reliable sources that it makes good use of. No signs of original research. Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 07:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

Based on my past experience with articles on subjects of this nature, the article satisfactorily covers all basic aspects of its topic. Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 07:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article maintains a neutral approach to its topic, throughout. Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 07:12, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Since its creation, the article has not been subjected to any edit warring or similar disruptive behaviours. Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 06:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

Both images used in the article are public domain, and serve relevant illustrative purposes. Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 06:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Comments

In the opening paragraph to the intro, it says, "A tropical disturbance located developed within the vicinity of the western Caroline Islands..." Was there supposed to be something more to that "located" bit, or its inclusion merely superfluous? Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 06:52, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Long story short, it's the fault of my copyediting. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 07:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
From "Meteorological history", paragraph 2: "On the evening of December 11, the JTWC increased the intensity of 170 km/h (105 mph), its peak wind speed." Unless something else that was supposed to be added in there was overlooked, shouldn't that be "increased the intensity to 170 km/h"? Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 07:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, good call. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 07:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
From "Preparations and Impact: Philippines", paragraph 1: "Sixteen Philippine Airlines flights to and from the central Philippines." The point being, what about the sixteen flights? Could/ought this sentence be merged with one of the surrounding sentences for context? Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 07:09, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Just missed a word here. Fixed. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 07:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 07:43, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to say that this article satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations! Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (talk) 08:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]