Talk:Tropical Storm Beryl (1988)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tropical Storm Beryl (1988) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Tropical Storm Beryl (1988) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 21, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
May 25, 2008	Good article reassessment	Kept

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 8, 2023.

Current status: Good article

Alabama

This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Assessment

Nice job hink. I see you've already GA Nominated it. B-Low, nothing really to change.Mitch azenia 19:34, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA on hold

I have reviewed this article according to the GA criteria. There are a few things that should be fixed before I pass it.

In the intro sentence, the word "rare" is used. Could you perhaps include a statement or two in the Storm history section why it was a rare storm?
"Impact in Florida was minor." Please reword this sentence to expand it. "The impact of the storm...."
"A 15 year-old boy on the boat drowned, the only direct fatality from the storm." I think there should be a hyphen between 15 and year.

These shouldn't take you long to fix at all. Please fix them within seven days and I'll pass the article. Let me know on my talk page if you have any questions or when you are done and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Nehrams2020 07:54, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA passed

I have passed this article according to the GA criteria. Good work on fixing the suggestions so quickly. To anyone that is reading this, if you have the time please consider reviewing an article or two at GAN to assist with the backlog. --Nehrams2020 19:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps Review: Pass

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 22:03, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]