Talk:Tropical Storm Bertha (2002)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tropical Storm Bertha (2002) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Tropical Storm Bertha (2002) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 10, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
May 25, 2008	Good article reassessment	Kept
October 26, 2008	Featured topic candidate	Not promoted
May 31, 2012	Featured topic candidate	Promoted
January 22, 2024	Featured topic removal candidate	Demoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 29, 2006. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Tropical Storm Bertha, the second tropical storm of the 2002 Atlantic hurricane season, was one of only 3 tropical cyclones to make landfall on both Louisiana and Texas, with the others being Allison (2001) and Fern (1971)?
Current status: Good article

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Rainfall image

Unfortunately, that's all that's all that's available. The shading one doesn't exist yet. Hurricanehink (talk) 03:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Assessment

No Point of View: Easy pass.
Factualality: I'm not sure, but for now pass.
Broad: Yep. Well done here. Pass
Stable: Pass.
Well written: It's hink's work, easy pass.
Images: Pass

As written #5, well written Pass for now, I have no real complaints for it. Congrats.Mitch azenia(7900+edits) 23:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you're not sure about factual accuracy of articles, you should not be passing them! – Ch acor 16:14, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps Review: Pass

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 21:55, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Tropical Storm Bertha (2002)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The fixed isohyet rainfall map would be better for this page, as the contour gradients aren't very visible at small thumbnail sizes. Tito xd^(?!?) 03:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 03:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 09:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)