Talk:Tropical Storm Arlene (2011)

Tropical Storm Arlene (2011) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 24, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Really nice image

Here, NOAA Environmental Visualization Laboratory Image of the Day. More info here--TimL (talk) 21:09, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Importance

I'm lowering it to low again. Tropical Storm Alpha (2005) had 26 deaths in a non-developed country and was low importance. Arlene just seems pretty average, albeit on the high-side of low importance. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:42, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What does the development of a country have to do with importance? Honestly, I think 25 fatalities and widespread damage is enough to warrant mid-importance. ★ Auree _talk 05:45, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Developed countries generally have better infrastructure. A storm killing 25 people in Bangladesh would certainly be low. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 06:06, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, seeing the damage totals and the extent of information, I agree that it should be mid-importance. Good thing this is a wiki and we can change things :) --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:22, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Going to be adding a list of useful sources here to update the article later on:

More to come. Feel free to add to the list. ★ Auree _talk 16:27, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Arlene (2011)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Yellow Evan (talk · contribs) 04:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC) This article is in good shape. However, my concerns are:[reply]

Better opener. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Originating from an Atlantic tropical wave, the precursor disturbance crossed the Yucatán Peninsula before emerging into the Bay of Campeche over warm waters." delink Atlatnic, major term per WP:OVERLINKING. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"and on June 30 Arlene " comma before "Arlene". Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. STO12 (talk) 04:48, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there a source in the lead? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. STO12 (talk) 17:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The MH is really good; however, it needs to be updated via TCR. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
" Throughout the country, Arlene resulted in 22 confirmed fatalities and left one person missing." source? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"[28] In the wake of Arlene, one fatality was confirmed in Chiapas due to the effects of the storm.[1]" redundancy, either the first part or the last part should be removed. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Parts of the impact could use some copyediting. For example, "They were both extended shortly after" sounds weird. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Prior to impact, the IMSS activated a contingency plan for risk zones in the states of Veracruz and Tamaulipas." IMO "Prior to impact seems odd. In addition, spell out IMSS on it's first usage per MOS. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Damage from the storm surmounted Mex$67 million (US$5.8 million) in Tamaulipas.[50]" wtf, what does "Mex" mean. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Remember, I'm not the person who created the article, let alone add that. I also don't really appreciate foul language on this review, can you tone the level down a bit? The "Mex" is trying to point out Arlene's total in Mexican Currency. I'll change it. STO12 (talk) 16:49, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know. Tell me when you have changed it. Thanks. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:58, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. STO12 (talk) 16:55, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Swollen rivers in El Arenal and Huejutla drowned two people, who were later confirmed dead.[52] In the wake of the disaster, the government of Hidalgo allocated a total Mex$17 million (US$1.45 million) in order to initiate rehabilitation work.[53] " see above. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. STO12 (talk) 16:55, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

any aftermath? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Are the links on the talk page used in the article? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why is Stan linked in the See also? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane

Done. STO12 (talk) 16:57, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Swamp the 2011 AHS link with a Timeline of the 2011 Atlantic hurricane season link. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. STO12 (talk) 16:58, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Refs 47 and 58 use Staff Writer Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane

In better shape than Harvey, but still some work needed. It's close though. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 04:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the issues not addressed above. Please pass/fail or reply speedily as this review has been open way longer than it should have been. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 17:34, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meh, I'm used to the days of no GAN review limits, but I am passing this article. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 22:34, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]