Jump to content

Talk:Tilia johnsoni

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

The link "type locality" links to Type locality (geology) but I wondered whether the description at Type (biology)#Use of types might not be more accurate. I'm no paleobotanist, nor geologist, nor botanist of any other type, but since this seems to straddle the line between the two articles one might link to, I thought I'd at least ask the question. W.stanovsky (talk) 20:43, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

With paleobotany type localities, the age, formation, and location are generally the specified items for a location. I chose the Type locality (geology) as the article that more closely relates. Type (biology)#Use of types is more directed towards the different "types" then the locality itself which has one line in the section.--Kevmin (talk) 01:24, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]