Jump to content

Talk:Tiffany & Co. flagship store

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk18:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tiffany's flagship
Tiffany's flagship

Created by (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 18:44, 9 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Add new references here

[edit]

ɱ (talk) 03:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Tiffany & Co. flagship store/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 14:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) 18:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dibsing ♠PMC(talk) 18:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Its five storefront displays, changed about eight times a year, have had various designers over their history" - not sure the final clause is necessary, seems obvious (if it were only one designer since 1940 that might be worth noting). Are there any notable designers that could be called out instead?
  • "contains a facade of" - "has a facade of"
  • "Tiffany's sold the building in 1984" - did it continue to occupy as a renter during this time?
  • two sentences in a row start with "The rectangular land lot"
  • The stack of two images on the left breaks the left header - any reason one or both can't be on the right?
  • "A 2020s renovation replaced it" minor nitpick - "it" refers to the addition here, not the whole building? reads slightly ambiguously
  • You have so many contain/s/ed in this article. I reworded around 2 that were quite close to each other, but you may want to reword around a few others
  • "The flagship contains about 114,000 pieces of jewelry, including a $2.475 million engagement ring." - not sure the source justifies this statement. Does it always contain roughly this amount of jewelry? Is the engagement ring always there?
    • I've removed this sentence. I'm not even sure how much jewelry the store contains right now (I couldn't find hard numbers from a reliable source), but the precise amount is subject to change, and the source is from before the building's renovation. Epicgenius (talk) 17:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • "better expressed the modern age" - according to whom? since you're quoting, should attribute in-text
  • I did a light copyedit to the 2nd paragraph of the Atlas section, revert if you dislike

That's it! All other factors looking good. Images are appropriately used and freely licensed, either from Flickr or own-work uploads. No concerns about CV, POV, etc. Random skim of accessible sources popped no significant errors. ♠PMC(talk) 21:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.