Template:Did you know nominations/Tiffany & Co. flagship store
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 18:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Tiffany & Co. flagship store
- ... that Tiffany Trump is named for the Tiffany & Co. flagship store (pictured)? Source: Stanley, Alessandra (October 1, 2016). "The Other Trump". The New York Times. "([Marla Maples] also confirmed that Tiffany was named for one of Mr. Trump’s favorite deals: the air rights he bought above the landmark store to build Trump Tower.)"
- ALT1:... that after Donald Trump bought the development rights above the Tiffany & Co. flagship store (pictured), he named his daughter Tiffany after the store? Source: "The Other Trump". The New York Times.
- ALT2:... that in 2017, you could finally have breakfast at Tiffany's? Source: Dorman, John L. (November 11, 2017). "Finally, You Can Have Breakfast at Tiffany". The New York Times.
- ALT3:... that the Tiffany & Co. flagship store's five storefront displays are changed about eight times a year and planned more than a year in advance? Source: Felder, Rachel (November 29, 2018). "At Tiffany's, It's All Party, Party, Party". The New York Times.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Guan Bee Ong
- Comment: The image would not work too well for ALT2, or ALT3 for that matter.
Created by Ɱ (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 18:44, 9 February 2021 (UTC).
- nice article, creation/additions check out and no sign of overt copyvio. Hooks, well I like the principal hook and I like ALT2 by far, both check out and I'll leave it to the promoter to decide if a quirky (ALT2) is needed at the time of a set creation. Only sticking point is the QPQ appears to have been queried. Once that's sorted, this is good to go. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 11:39, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- The Rambling Man, thanks for the review. The issue in the QPQ review itself (Guan Bee Ong) was already fixed a few hours ago, I believe. I went for a walk and it was not only fixed but also promoted. Epicgenius (talk) 01:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- then all is just fine here. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 11:17, 15 February 2021 (UTC)