Talk:The Two Hundred

The Two Hundred is currently a Television good article nominee. Nominated by MudBurgers 2005 (talk) at 14:17, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 12 December 2024 by reviewer Bkissin (talk · contribs).

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Media

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Animation

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Two Hundred/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: MudBurgers 2005 (talk · contribs) 14:17, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk · contribs) 02:58, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I will be reviewing this article :) There has been a strong start and I think this article is able to be brought forward to GA status, however it is not at that level yet. Here are my initial concerns/comments:

1.) Lead - will properly review the lead afterwards, however:

A.) You can move the ref down to the main article.

B.) "as such is not considered canon." - I cannot find a source in the article confirming this - could you please provide one (unless it is in there and I have missed it, in which case please tell me) or remove it from the lead, as otherwise it is original research.

2.) Production:

A.) "The episode was directed by series veteran Jansen Yee, in her 24th time directing an episode of the show. This is the first episode she directed since "Hayley Smith, Seal Team Six""" - The information about Yee is not sourced and hence original research, so it should be removed or sourced.

B.) The same is the issue with the rest of the paragraph - whilst the episode credits may show who was involved in the production, the information about the team is not sourced and is original research.

C.) There is not a lot of information in this section other than who was involved in the production - can you find any interviews or behind the scenes information? Additionally, there is no information about it being the 200th episode.

3.) Cultural references - There is only one source in this section, and it is placed in the middle of the paragraph. Additionally, I have reviewed the source (and some of the info can be used for "production") and I do not think it verifies all the information in the section. Can you provide further sources for this and/or reword it to remove original research?

4.) Reception:

A.) "The Two Hundred" first aired on TBS in the United States on March 28, 2016" - This should not be in reception.

B.) " Drawing 1.08 million viewers and a 0.56 rating in the 18-49 demographic, being the highest-rated episode of the season since "The Devil Wears a Lapel Pin"." - Reword (e.g. "The episode's original broadcast attracted 1.08 million viewers".

C.) "the episode that placed #2 on the list" - replace "#2" with "second".

D.) Final paragraph - please include the authors' names in the source and the section. Additionally, I would replace "The author of the article concludes their review by saying" with "They added that.."

4.) Sources:

A.) If possible, the sources should be archived.

B.) The websites of the sources should ideally be linked (e.g. Den of Geek)

5.) Plot is a bit long - can this be trimmed?

However, I think the biggest issue is the lack of sources. There are only 7 sources, 1 of which is the episode itself, and this makes it hard to show the clear nobility by itself. It needs more sources and ideally more information to be included, such as about the production, behind the scenes information, promotion etc. It would also be great to see if any non-TV related websites cover the episode. If you cannot find many sources, I would recommend checking the archives. I am happy to have a look too to help expansion, and I can also look through magazines etc to see if there is any information I could send you to include.

Once the article has been expanded and the points above have been addressed I will do a proper full review. Please let me know if you have any questions at all :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 02:58, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]