Talk:The Royal Parks

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Royal Parks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Both articles (The Royal Parks and Royal Parks of London) overlap dramatically, with both including information on the Royal Parks charity and its predecessors, and both including information on all the open spaces managed by The Royal Parks charity (not only the eight royal parks). Furthermore, the definition of 'royal parks' used in the Royal Parks of London website appears to be 'parks managed by The Royal Parks', and not actually the royal parks of London (i.e. excluding Hampton Court Park). On top of that, articles tend to link to The Royal Parks when meaning the parks themselves, not the charity (e.g. Royal Parks Constabulary).

It would therefore make more sense to have one article listing the details of The Royal Parks charity, and the parks and open spaces that the charity administer rather than this weird badly-done split. Mauls (talk) 19:22, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 12:28, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Which were the original Four Royal Parks?

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

There's now Eight Royal Parks. Yet in 1997 there was apparently Four Royal Parks.

Which 4 parks were they? Danstarr69 (talk) 19:17, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Danstarr69: Your question should perhaps be addressed in a 'history' section of the article, which does not currently exist. You could request that it be added. The talk page is not really intended to be used for asking (or answering) general questions about the topic, but should rather be confined to discussions about how to improve the article. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:08, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Danstarr69: The Wikipedia:Reference desk might be able to help you with your question. Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 01:50, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]