Talk:Renaissance

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Renaissance article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 2 months

Renaissance was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 11, 2004	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
September 30, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed
May 17, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
May 17, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
August 31, 2008	Good article reassessment	Kept
July 28, 2023	Good article reassessment	Delisted
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 6, 2004.
Current status: Delisted good article

European history Top‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Top‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages High‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Social and political / Medieval High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy
	Medieval philosophy

Spoken Wikipedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles

Section sizes

Section size for Renaissance (41 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	4,907	4,907
Period	6,452	6,452
Overview	6,623	6,623
Origins	1,730	17,941
Latin and Greek phases of Renaissance humanism	4,728	4,728
Social and political structures in Italy	4,727	4,727
Black Death	4,442	4,442
Cultural conditions in Florence	2,314	2,314
Characteristics	20	28,531
Humanism	4,609	4,609
Humanism and libraries	1,371	1,371
Art	5,609	5,609
Science	6,615	6,615
Navigation and geography	2,270	2,270
Music	851	851
Religion	3,905	3,905
Self-awareness	3,281	3,281
Spread	461	33,931
England	3,762	3,762
France	1,991	1,991
Germany	1,224	1,224
Hungarian trecento and quattrocento	7,904	7,904
Renaissance in the Low Countries	1,470	1,470
Northern Europe	4,228	4,228
Poland	5,547	5,547
Portugal	5,328	5,328
Spain	1,930	1,930
Further countries	86	86
Historiography	20	11,440
Conception	4,263	4,263
Debates about progress	7,157	7,157
Other Renaissances	1,586	1,586
See also	229	229
References	15	2,256
Explanatory notes	45	45
Citations	31	31
General sources	2,165	2,165
Further reading	3,710	5,754
Historiography	1,737	1,737
Primary sources	307	307
External links	1,198	1,198
Total	120,848	120,848

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Movable type#Metal movable type in Europe|metal movable type]] The anchor (#Metal movable type in Europe) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

GA Reassessment

Renaissance

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delisted per consensus. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA from 2007. Significant unsourced material including entire unsourced sections throughout the article. I had placed comments before hand back in February stating that this would need to be fixed or i'd nominate it to be delisted and the issues still remain. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree: there are just too many unreferenced paragraphs. Phlsph7 (talk) 07:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeesh. Yes. It's in a pretty bad state. Getting this back to GA will be a real project. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:00, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delist - lots of effort needed to get this to GA standard. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 16:15, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.