Talk:The Brick House

United States: Kentucky / Louisville Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Low-importance).
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisville (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

That's a lot of collectives. Jamiem 02:44, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up

This article should be about the Old Brycc House if using the name Brycc House. The name needs to be changed to The Brick House to conform to the subject of the article for accuracy. The article needs in line references to be listed. Some of the external links should be removed and used as in line references instead. These are just some of the immediate things that need work. -Jahnx (talk) 12:40, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move --Lox (t,c) 09:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Brycc House → The Brick House — Article is about the current community center known as the Brick House that was formerly known as the Brycc House; the renaming is to conform to the current use. —Jahnx (talk) 07:48, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Support Due to the name The Brycc House now being defunct and the organization is now known as The Brick House I believe the move to conform to the current name and use. The article is also about the current Brick House and only mentions The Bycc House for notability purposes. Jahnx (talk) 08:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support as long as The Brycc House redirects to The Brick House, and the article continues to refer to the former name. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 01:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Once deleted

I was looking at User talk:Openbrick and see that an article on the same subject was once deleted. Is it notable enough to even bother renaming?--Bedford (talk) 08:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I considered deletion of the article after reading. However the article was made in 2006 after reviewing the history. I believe this was the origional article covering the BRYCC House and now it has garnered the life of the Brick House, much like the Brick House Louisville. This article might have notability as a community center, however it doesn't have much of a case unless its cleaned up. So the question is it worth the trouble? Jahnx (talk) 12:49, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure there was a full-length article about this group in both the CJ and LEO. If someone really wanted the sources are probably there. --W.marsh 16:19, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I perfromed an overhaul on cleaning this article up. I'll be posting it for reassessment soon. -Jahnx (talk) 15:46, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:The Brick House/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==WikiPrject Louisville Assessment==

Class was rated as Stub

The classification of the article was rated as a stub due to the article having no references listed and only external links. The article reads like an advertisement and has a bulk list section which needs to be changed into prose format. There is a lot of cleanup that needs to be conducted in the article such as the external links have several links that aren't needed that can be used for in line references. An infobox is needed and the article also needs a better organization of its sections. Double check the article with the Manual of STyle.

Importance was rated as low

The community center has a main focus for musical imput to a limited source of people.

Jahnx (talk) 10:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 01:56, 1 January 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 08:01, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The Brick House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Needs to be deleted

This was never notable enough, and its own website has not been updated since 2011. Literaturegirl (talk) 20:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

i disagree, there are enough citations from secondary sources to establish notability. Mujinga (talk) 23:21, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]