User talk:Literaturegirl

Hello Literaturegirl, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Literaturegirl, good luck, and have fun. – Chris Troutman (talk) 00:16, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Troutman (talk) 00:16, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CoI

Hi. I noticed your edits to Nathan M Farrugia. If you have a conflict of interest be sure to properly announce such, as the terms of use now require disclosure. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:18, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've read two of his novels, but I don't think that constitutes a conflict of interest, does it?

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

Hi there! I fixed your nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James L. Hurley. Next time, try using one of the automated tools so that you don't miss anything. It would also be a good idea to have a careful read of WP:BEFORE. Cheers, St★lwart¹¹¹ 01:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stalwart, Thank you so much for remedying the coding problem, if that is what it was. Rest assured, I did read the BEFORE guidelines, before everything. Mostly, what I get from WP:BEFORE is that there might be notability that is not documented in the article. That is not the case in either of my deletion nominations. I still think the list of pikeville presidents page needs to be deleted, but will not take any further action until you think I'm ready. Thank you again. --Literaturegirl (talk) 17:11, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. WP:BEFORE includes suggestions for dealing with articles you believe require improvement, and subjects you believe fail to meet inclusion criteria. Tagging, editing and talk-page discussions are all recommended actions before (hence the title) you nominate something for deletion. It also includes helpful links to deletion process instructions so that you can nominate something properly (if you choose to do so manually). Again, the automated tools make the process much easier. I didn't close either discussion; they are both there and can be contributed to. St★lwart¹¹¹ 23:32, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of presidents of the University of Pikeville. Maybe slow down a bit and just check that edits are working properly before trying others. Cheers, St★lwart¹¹¹ 01:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have I slowed down enough, yet? --Literaturegirl (talk) 17:11, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) You might want to try Twinkle, one of the automated tools Stalwart111 mentioned above. ― Qwerfjkl talk 19:18, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, though your response to some people in that first AFD suggests you're getting way too emotionally involved in a routine deletion discussion. The vast majority of discussions will include for and against arguments. Those that oppose your view (even those who suggest "trouting", which is a tongue-in-cheek "reprimand" between editors) don't do so with any personal malice (trust me, you'll be able to recognise a response with malice when you see it). Your nomination posed the question "Unless there is a policy that all university presidents are automatically notable..." and the response from some there is simply Yes, there is. Okay, question answered. It's not bullying or a personal attack to answer a hypothetical you posed. I'll be the first to agree that Wikipedia's policies don't always make sense, especially when referenced mid-prose as bizarre acronyms in almost in-joke fashion. St★lwart¹¹¹ 23:32, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your request

While I was looking through your contributions, I also saw this. Both external links have now been added to Frances Parthenope Verney. St★lwart¹¹¹ 23:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Literaturegirl

Thank you for creating Hank the Tank.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:47, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amy Loughren for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amy Loughren is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Loughren until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 01:57, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure if you know..

Hey, I’m not Good with tech, especially when it comes to using Wikipedia abs trying to talk to others but I was just reading about the movie ‘The Good Nurse’, and saw your comment wondering why the nurse who helped captured the evil psycho doesn’t have a Wikipedia page? I’m not sure if you know this but I’ve just come across her on here. She is now a reiki healer.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Loughren 49.182.76.201 (talk) 10:55, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I actually wrote the first draft of that article and posted it.--Literaturegirl (talk) 19:08, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of US Peace Prize for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article US Peace Prize is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/US Peace Prize until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BeŻet (talk) 16:54, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. That sure didn't get much discussion. Congrats on judging the merit of an article based on a website. Literaturegirl (talk) 17:54, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:US Peace Prize Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:US Peace Prize Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. The banner saying that additional citations are needed is not a threat of deletion. Further, all information on Wikipedia should be supported by citations (with rare exceptions). Please see Verification. ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:15, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]