Talk:The Arsenal of Freedom

The Arsenal of Freedom has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

The Arsenal of Freedom is part of the Star Trek: The Next Generation (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 15, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
August 10, 2016	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Star Trek Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[USS Enterprise (NCC-1701-D)#Saucer separation|saucer separation]] The anchor (#Saucer separation) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Provocative History?

In the episode notes, it said about Crusher "The implication in this scene, expounded on in further episodes, is that she has a provocative history beyond her officially known one, but it is never explained exactly what this is." When was it ever hinted at that she had a provocative history? TwistedRed 02:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some people just work too hard to come up with trivia, when we don't even want any on wiki. Deleting it as it not noteworthy trivia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 03:38, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also some other stuff, like the stardate mention, if you read thru the stardate article, it explains that it is unclear how exactly it works as it sometimes decreases and sometimes increases (30620.1 is before 23859.7 for instance). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 03:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shooting the seperated Enterprise

How did the producers film the Enterprise-D when the ship seperates?--BigMac1212 (talk) 02:23, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Memory Alpha claims it was re-used footage from Encounter at Farpoint. Miyagawa (talk) 11:48, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Different announcer

Ernie Anderson usually does the voice over of the previews of Season 1 episodes. But not this episode:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dw2CD0eZPb8

Is that Don LaFontaine?--BigMac1212 (talk) 02:45, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Arsenal of Freedom/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 21:02, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sentence "Critics praised the appearance of Vincent Schiavelli, but otherwise was a mixed response." -- Sentence needs to be reworked.

Reworded to "The opinions of critics were mixed, but singled out the appearance of Vincent Schiavelli for praise." Miyagawa (talk) 18:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"The field prevents the Enterprise from beaming up the away-team. " -- Might want to clarify a little, the last graph says only Riker was affected by the beam.

Clarified - it was a different field. Miyagawa (talk) 18:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Story editor Maurice Hurley saw the plot of "The Arsenal of Freedom" as commentary on the sale of American Grumman F-14 Tomcats to Iran taken to the "ultimate conclusion"." -- A few things here: one, you might want to be more specific about the incident, or explain what current event inspired it. Two, I was under the impression that there wasn't a lot of allegory in the Next Generation, unlike the Original Series. Was this a normal to have a 'moral' to the story? Three, explain the analogy a little more.

I've added some background. The TNG morals only appear probably in about 5% of the episodes. There's more morals in a season of DS9 or TOS than in the entire TNG run! I'm not 100% sure of what Hurley was trying to say, but I think he was saying that the country went bankrupt because no one bought the technology. Miyagawa (talk) 18:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"The story originally had Picard dying" -- Had they really wanted to kill off Stewart's character or was he going to come back to life at the end of the episode. As worded it sounds like Stewart was supposed to leave the show.

Reworded to say that Picard was injured - rather than they intended to kill him off! :) Miyagawa (talk) 18:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One disambiguation link.
Fixed - I must get around to creating an article at Maurice Hurley (screenwriter) at some point. Miyagawa (talk) 18:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No duplicate links. All external links are working. No images so there are no problems with licensing, and there are no problems with article stability and neutrality.

Placing the article on hold for fixes. —Ed!^(talk) 00:10, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good work, passing the GA. —Ed!^(talk) 01:46, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]