Talk:The Apprentice (British TV series)
The Apprentice (British TV series) is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about The Apprentice, or anything not directly related to improving the Wikipedia article. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about The Apprentice, or anything not directly related to improving the Wikipedia article at the Reference desk. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
|
|||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on The Apprentice (UK TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070425100214/http://www.whatsontv.co.uk/primetime/the_apprentice to http://www.whatsontv.co.uk/primetime/the_apprentice
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070329001934/http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/tv_and_radio/article1521066.ece to http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/tv_and_radio/article1521066.ece
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724064304/http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2011/07/19/the-apprentice-fated-or-flawed/ to http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2011/07/19/the-apprentice-fated-or-flawed/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130607160659/http://www.nationalstudentapprentice.com/ to http://www.nationalstudentapprentice.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:57, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Idea for new section - History
[edit]Have this idea, that I want to share with other editors to see what their opinions will be for it - how about the inclusion of a History section for the programme, detailing its origins, and its eventual creation to what it became when it first was broadcast on British TV? Some of this section would include the moving of information about its origins from the Lead, and any other information that could flush it out could be found from some research, but overall, I think it would be nice to know this. What do others think? GUtt01 (talk) 23:05, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- I would support it as long as it is sourced and not OR. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 23:08, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Well, like I said above, some of the Lead does feature information about the show's origin. And those pieces of information do have citations to back them up. GUtt01 (talk) 20:47, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Discussion for Deletion, for articles covering each respective series of The Apprentice
[edit]A discussion has begun over the deletion of articles covering each series of this programme. The general basis for this discussion is that the articles covering these series have "Too much detail for general-interest, especially notes", as stated by the nominator for their deletions. If you wish to add in your views, do so now. GUtt01 (talk) 16:16, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- AFDs of this nature are frequently bundled. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:17, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Chrissymad:What do you mean by "fregunetly bundled"? GUtt01 (talk) 16:23, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
- WP:BUNDLE. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:25, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Hatnote
[edit]Hi, Just a heads up I've removed the hatnote as I don't really see the point in having one, If the article was titled "The Apprentice" only then sure but as it's under "UK TV series" it seems all but pointless.... –Davey2010Talk 22:34, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Article needs a trim?
[edit]Just a thought as reading this, but goddamn is it long. As of today it's 3x the size of the American version on which it is based on, and in line with reducing the amount of verbosity in the series pages, I think there's a considerable amount of detail that could be trimmed off this page too.
What do people think? I'm not particularly inclined either way, but figured before I get the shears out and invoke needless edit wars I'd ask opinions. eeveeman (talk) 19:52, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Request for Comment - Infobox in Series Overview Section
[edit]For some time, The Apprentice (British TV series) has used an Infobox to break down information on each series in terms of candidates involved, plus Winner & Runner-up. Unfortunately, I'm concerned over whether this arrangement is appropriate. Should it stay?
- YES
- NO
Please list reason for your answer below. GUtt01 (talk) 20:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
- Apologies GUtt01 I didn't realise there was a series overview table in the article so therefore I've removed the infoboxes as it adds nothing to the article. –Davey2010Talk 20:49, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Davey2010: Quite alright. I felt that they were excessive to a point where there was hardly any reason to have them, considering all candidates are listed within each respective Series' article, as well as a "List of Candidates" article. GUtt01 (talk) 21:20, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
- Absolutely agree GUtt01, Thanks for originally removing them and again apologies for reveting you, Hope you have a lovely Crimbo and a very Happy New Year:), Many thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:34, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Davey2010: Quite alright. I felt that they were excessive to a point where there was hardly any reason to have them, considering all candidates are listed within each respective Series' article, as well as a "List of Candidates" article. GUtt01 (talk) 21:20, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
"The Apprentice (UK TV series)/Archive 3" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Apprentice (UK TV series)/Archive 3 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § The Apprentice (UK TV series)/Archive 3 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 06:27, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
"The Apprentice (UK TV series)/Archive 1" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect The Apprentice (UK TV series)/Archive 1 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § The Apprentice (UK TV series)/Archive 1 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 06:27, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia former featured articles
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class BBC articles
- Mid-importance BBC articles
- WikiProject BBC articles
- B-Class television articles
- Mid-importance television articles
- B-Class The Apprentice UK articles
- Top-importance The Apprentice UK articles
- The Apprentice UK task force articles
- B-Class British television articles
- Unknown-importance British television articles
- British television task force articles
- B-Class Reality television articles
- Mid-importance Reality television articles
- Reality television task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- B-Class London-related articles
- Low-importance London-related articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- Wikipedia articles that use British English