This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Hi there. I have an idea: I think it would be appropriate if the article about Tharros were merged with the page about Oristano, as the latter is steadily developing into a major page. What do you think ?Roibeird (talk) 22:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Very sorry, but I don't share your idea. Those are two different cities, both in times and locations. Why not then merge Naples and Herculaneum and Ercolano ? On the other hand, I believe your are welcome to give more insight on the fact that the administrative role of Tharros was moved to Oristano in the Middle-Age. --Olevy (talk) 17:04, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
