Talk:Thanksgiving (Family Guy)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thanksgiving (Family Guy) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanksgiving (Family Guy) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 3, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: Family Guy Mid‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Family Guy work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Thanksgiving (Family Guy)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ebe123 (talk · contribs) 11:56, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Main

"The episode follows the Griffin family, and several of their neighbors, as they celebrate the Thanksgiving holiday. As they sit down for dinner, they are shocked to see that their neighbors Joe and Bonnie Swanson's son has suddenly returned, after having originally thought that he had died in the Iraq War." so after the first sentence, it is not flowing as well as other sentences.
- Done. Gage (talk) 08:29, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - It isn't fixed. I think that it should be in a different paragraph. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 10:39, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Can you give an example of what you'd like to see done? Gage (talk) 03:15, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      - "The episode follows the Griffin family, and several of their neighbors, as they celebrate the Thanksgiving holiday.

- - - - As they sit down for dinner, they are shocked to see that Kevin Swanson, son of Joe and Bonnie Swanson, has returned from Iraq."
You want the lead to be split into two paragraphs? I strongly oppose that suggestion, as it has never been a requirement of any of the other GAs that have done, or even the FAC I got promoted. Please do not fail the article based on this one point. Everything else is fine, in my opinion. Gage (talk) 14:33, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, it was just a suggestion so I would of not failed this based on 1 point.

Reception

I feel like Kevin McFarland's review is getting too much weight on it, while that the positive review is considerably smaller.
- Done. Gage (talk) 08:29, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Found nothing else, putting on hold (7 days). ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 20:49, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

Pass. Good job for the article. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 16:00, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]