Talk:Thalmann algorithm

Content

This article has a wealth of sources and a dearth of content. Can it be fleshed-out into at least a start-class article? --RexxS (talk) 16:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 20:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

B class checklist

1 The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations where necessary. - It has reliable sources, no controversial material, solidly referenced.

2 The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. - It contains basic description, some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics are missing. Unsure how much more would be needed.

3 The article has a defined structure. - Content is organized into groups of related material, including a lead section but could probably be expanded with more sections.

4 The article is reasonably well-written. - The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly. The Manual of Style has been followed fairly closely.

5 The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. - There is not much scope for illustration. The most useful diagram is present.

6 The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. - The article assumes some technical background in the field. Technical terms are used without much explanation.

Article clearly does not meet B-class criteria, but probably makes it for C.

Comment requested. Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 20:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Belated thanks. I changed the tag to C-class. —Patrug (talk) 06:13, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thalmann algorithm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.divermag.com/v2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=36

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:12, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]