Talk:Tewkesbury Abbey
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |
Help improve our long-awaited Wikiproject!
[edit]Untitled
[edit]Please join our project to upgrade Gloucestershire-related articles to featured status. Mike |talk
16:38, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Size
[edit]Is now St Mary Redcliffe church in Bristol the second-largest parish church? [[Benbristol] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.233.59.250 (talk) 10:30, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Not only is this addition a form of advertising it is not clear the churches position of retaining copyright in this manner is legal. It should have stay removed.Saffron Blaze (talk) 21:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
- How can the reduction of an entire unwanted new section advertising guided tours of the Abbey be seen as "a form of advertising". And how does reference to a church booklet and photogaphy permit constitute a breach of church copyright? I think a short note on photograohy restrictions is very appropriate in the Worship section, is also generally useful and should be retained. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:55, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
- Might have been something I missed. It appeared to me as if the whole thing was put back when I looked first. Still not a fan of the statement that is there but that may have something to do with my distaste for the practice of charging photographers to photograph historic structures then saying they are restricted in what they can do with the photographs. Saffron Blaze (talk) 00:18, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- I see. I think readers should be warned! A small footnote would be fine, and possibly better, since it's difficult to see where this information logically fits. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 07:44, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Might have been something I missed. It appeared to me as if the whole thing was put back when I looked first. Still not a fan of the statement that is there but that may have something to do with my distaste for the practice of charging photographers to photograph historic structures then saying they are restricted in what they can do with the photographs. Saffron Blaze (talk) 00:18, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
File:Tewkesbury Abbey 2011.jpg to appear as POTD soon
[edit]Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Tewkesbury Abbey 2011.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on September 5, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-09-05. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:20, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
I've changed the blurb. It didn't make sense and has some bad grammar.
Original: "The Abbey of the Blessed Virgin Mary at Tewkesbury, Gloucestershire, is one of the largest parish church in England. It was established and has borne witness to several parts of Tewkesbury's history."
Now: "The Abbey of the Blessed Virgin Mary at Tewkesbury, Gloucestershire, is one of the largest parish churches in England. It was established in the 11th-century and has borne witness to much of Tewkesbury's history."
--Rushton2010 (talk) 23:36, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
- It was modified in the middle of writing owing to a lack of referencing here (makes it hard to write a blurb) and, since I wrote it at 5:45 a.m., a lot got missed. Thanks for catching the writing errors. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:47, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Second largest parish church in the country?
[edit]The claim does not seem to be supported by sources. This website http://www.wearechurch.net/list-of-largest-parish-churches-in-country/ does not include it in the top fifteen, though that may be because it was excluded from the sample. In any case, a reliable source for the claim is needed. Ghughesarch (talk) 00:47, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Tewkesbury Abbey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070313032627/http://www.charities-database.co.uk/201845.html to http://www.charities-database.co.uk/201845.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:37, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Hugh le Despencer died in 1348 (or 1349 depending on when you think the year began) but is presently logged as just "1338". This needs advancing by 10 years and making clear that it is his date of death (ie, "d.1348"), but I'm not sure how to do this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.170.141.245 (talk) 19:25, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Flooding
[edit]Although a citation is mentioned, I would just like to point out that the flood waters of the River Severn did not reach the Abbey - it was flooded to a number of inches by groundwater : I helped sandbag the entrance and lived just across. Birmingham1965 (talk) 02:08, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class Catholicism articles
- Low-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- C-Class Middle Ages articles
- Low-importance Middle Ages articles
- C-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages
- C-Class Anglicanism articles
- Mid-importance Anglicanism articles
- C-Class Christianity articles
- C-Class Architecture articles
- Mid-importance Architecture articles
- C-Class WikiProject Gloucestershire articles
- High-importance WikiProject Gloucestershire articles
- WikiProject Gloucestershire pages
- Articles created or improved during WikiProject Europe's 10,000 Challenge