Talk:Ten Commandments

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ten Commandments article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.

Ten Commandments was a Philosophy and religion good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 7, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed
December 24, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed

Current status: Former good article nominee

Religion: Interfaith Top‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

Bible Top‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religious texts (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles

Judaism Top‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity High‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics / Religion Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Philosophy of religion

Law High‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Near East Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology: Oral tradition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Matt Katz (15 May 2024). "NYU's mandatory ethics homework for student protesters includes 'The Simpsons,' Wikipedia". Gothamist.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 6 sections are present.

Colouring of numbers in section 3

In section 3, where the commandments are listed along with their numbering for each biblical tradition, the numbers have coloured backgrounds. Initially, I assumed that entries with the same colour had something in common, and searched the surrounding text for an explanation. I've come to the conclusion that the colours were simply intended to help legibility, but in the current form they are potentially confusing. Either each number should have a totally different colour, an explanation that they have no further significance should be added, or the colours should be removed entirely.

I initially agreed with you and started to delete the background colours BUT looking at the result, I realised that the colours help to see the grouping of the commandments - should be different colours used and not repeated (but not sure how to do that) 185.69.144.69 (talk) 05:46, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bingo! 10-colour palette added per suggestion. Let’s see how long it is before a vandal reverts it.. 85.255.237.72 (talk) 11:47, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can we have some text explaining what the numbers in the colored boxes mean?

Is it the number of times this commandment appears in that particular category? 98.169.19.80 (talk) 13:54, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

The article is written from a Chassidic view, that is, in rabbinic judaism the ten commandments do not exist as a concept. The revelation to Moses on Mount Sinai was Law that was passed on orally, later it was written down and became known as the oral Torah or Talmud. In contrast, Christianity, Samaritanians and several other non-chassidic Jewish communities do recognize the ten commandments. 190.102.58.173 (talk) 05:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t understand what you’re saying: is a Chassidic view NOT rabbinic Judaism ? In my orthodox (rabbinic) synagogue, the Ten Commandments are on the Ark.

Also, the revelation to Moses was 3 fold: the 10 Commandments, the written Torah and the oral law..? 185.69.144.69 (talk) 05:56, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a difference between rabbinic Judaism and Hasidism Nukie2011 (talk) 02:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Critical historical analysis section needs a full re-write

Almost no sources from the 21st century. Kind of a jumble to read. Anyone up for the task? IncandescentBliss (talk) 14:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Coogan‘s book The Ten Commandments: A Short History of an Ancient Text (2015) might be a good place to start

The Ten Commandments: A Short History of an Ancient Text IncandescentBliss (talk) 15:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quoted and source from Documentary Hypothesis page

Just a note that I sourced this quote from the Documentary Hypothesis page.

“The consensus around the classical documentary hypothesis has now collapsed. This was triggered in large part by the influential publications of John Van Seters, Hans Heinrich Schmid, and Rolf Rendtorff in the mid-1970s.” IncandescentBliss (talk) 00:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I used its sources for the references as well. IncandescentBliss (talk) 00:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open discussion

@potatín5 I’m unclear what the issue is here. I used the source you provided, quoting exclusively from it and you reverted. I have asked specifically that you consult with me on editing my work before deleting. I’m trying to act in good faith here.

The source you quoted said:

a) the definition of the Ten Commandments was “covenant document” b) it cited no sources since 2001 who hold to them being pre-exilic

There is very clearly an academic consensus that the text wasn’t fixed. I’m literally just saying that there were three versions.

Please *in all future cases* consult with me before deleting my edits. IncandescentBliss (talk) 21:58, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The current definition is more generic and has been longstanding here. Rom-Shiloni's definition is more restricted to its Hebrew Bible context. Take into account that many modern-day Christians do not believe that the Old Testament covenant remains in vogue while still consider the Ten Commandments as an important source for ethical and religious principles. That's why the current definition is preferable. Potatín5 (talk) 22:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The definition should be about what the Ten Commandments are though not what people regard them as today.

Regarding dating, the Oxford article clearly makes the point at the end that there’s a *reason* people are moving in the direction of a later dating. Simply looking at the dates listed in the article makes this clear. He’s not saying there’s three equally present views now. He’s saying there’s three they have been present and one is eclipsing the other two by and large. IncandescentBliss (talk) 22:22, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The difference between the three versions is an very common topic in the literature. This should not be glossed over.

Edward L. Greenstein, “Decalogue,” in The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Bible and Law, ed. Brent A. Strawn (2 vols.; Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, 2015), 1.164-72. IncandescentBliss (talk) 22:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Things are always defined in relation to what people regard them to be at a specific time. The Ten Commandments are no exception to this rule (see how Merriam-Webster dictionary defines them here).

Regarding dating, the source clearly states that none of the proposed datings can be demonstrated on firm grounds. You are just supposing things that the source never explicitly states in a way that stands close to WP:OR. Potatín5 (talk) 22:34, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging all extended-confirmed editors to the page since January 1 so we can reach a consensus

@Onel5969 @Bammie73 @Drmies @Auric @Hans-Friedrich Tamke @Chaotic Enby IncandescentBliss (talk) 22:18, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitrary break

Hi, I was asked by u:IncandescentBliss to take a look at this dispute. I understand that this diff contains the contested changes. There are quite a lot of changes there and it's hard to discuss all of them at the same time. I would suggest discussing them one-by-one, starting from the most important one. Alaexis_¿question? 07:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion and the article are ridiculous. The bible tells the story, God writting with his finger, and then shows what was written. A and take different from the traditional ten commandments… so every editor is jumping thru hopes, taking a sentence here, and pasting it next to another one there, and constructing the story to match what they learned in their religious tradition. This we call neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C40:7900:212:AD49:A80A:622C:EEAF (talk) 00:54, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A List of Commandments

Speaking as an American, some readers will look at this page hoping to find a list of the 10 commandments as we might see them displayed in the Bible or on say displays at state fund schools. I don't see that here. Did I miss them? DyslexicDeficit (talk) 04:50, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Christians usually do not agree upon a standard list of the Ten Commandments. See Ten Commandments#Religious traditions. So, what pleases one denomination, makes angry others denominations. tgeorgescu (talk) 03:00, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]