Talk:TWA Flight Center
TWA Flight Center has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 29, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from TWA Flight Center appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 October 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Creating article
[edit]i added this information. it had been deleted from the JFK entry, which seems to have 10 million fingers on it and no one able to keep up with what is lost. Apologies for early lack of citations..i know more is needed but it is first step.BrandlandUSA 18:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
1969 photograph
[edit]Here is a fair-use photograph of the terminal in "happier times"...[1] Enigma3542002 04:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
NRHP
[edit]I've rated the article as a "C" class article for the NRHP project. It's much improved, but perhaps leans too heavily on recent developments and could use discussion of its reception when built and influences on others. Acroterion (talk) 02:21, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Yes... much harder to come by info on the original building... but will do.842U (talk) 13:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on TWA Flight Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20121205060637/http://observatory.designobserver.com/entry.html?entry=2897 to http://observatory.designobserver.com/entry.html?entry=2897
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 11:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- ... that Eero Saarinen intended his TWA Flight Center (pictured) to be practically useful as well as a symbol to "interpret the sensation of flying"? Source: Architectural Record: p. 129. July 1962.
- ALT1:... that contractors spent 5,500 man-hours on drawings for the design of the TWA Flight Center (pictured)? Source: Architectural Forum. 113: p. 119. August 1960.
ALT2:... that during the 2000s, the TWA Flight Center (pictured) was used as a filming location, and later housed an art exhibition that closed after the building was vandalized?Source: NY Times 2003, NY Times 2004
Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 15:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC).
- @Epicgenius: Passed GA recently enough, long enough, and no issue was found with regards to copyvio, neutrality, or referencing. ALT1 is probably too long, ALT1 and the top hook are present in the article but can't verify the top hook in the given source (p.129 seems to be about something else but maybe I missed something. QPQ done. ALT1 good to go. HaEr48 (talk) 01:07, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Art and architecture good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class Architecture articles
- High-importance Architecture articles
- GA-Class aviation articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- GA-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
- Mid-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
- GA-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of Mid-importance
- GA-Class New York City articles
- Mid-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles