Talk:TLC (Australian TV channel)

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Moot; page was moved to Travel and Living Channel (out of process!), which solves the key concerns of nomination. No prejudice against immediate new movereq to change to [:TLC (Australia and New Zealand)]] (the original req of nom) or other target. DMacks (talk) 06:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discovery Travel & Living (Australia and New Zealand) → TLC (Australia and New Zealand) — Discovery Travel & Living was rebranded today as TLC (with TLC standing for "Travel and Living Channel" NOT "The Learning Channel". I have completely updated the entire page with the new logo, updated history, etc. but the name should be changed. Forbesy 777 (talk) 07:29, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

Any additional comments: Forbesy 777 (talk) 07:29, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be better to move it to Travel & Living Channel (Australia and New Zealand). Reubot (talk) 07:31, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There seem to be several similar TLC articles, with various names, and many potential redirects/disambiguation hatnotes missing. Anything to tidy them up (some of them could even be merged, I guess) has my support.--Kotniski (talk) 13:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Image copyright problem with File:Discovert Travel & Adventure.png

The image File:Discovert Travel & Adventure.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

File:Discovery Travel & Living logo.svg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use candidate from Commons: File:TLC LA.png

The file File:TLC LA.png, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at File:TLC LA.png. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 01:26, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Availability in InfoBox

I have removed the Indonesian providers from the InfoBox today as I have realized that they are also listed on the TLC Asia. As such, I believe this channel solely services Australia and New Zealand. If anyone can provide evidence as to what channel feeds are available and what countries they service it would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Forbesy 777 (talk) 05:38, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 September 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to TLC (Australian TV channel). SST flyer 10:42, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Travel and Living Channel → TLC (Australia) – The channel is refered to both on-air and in written material as TLC and has for several years. While it may have been called Travel and Living Channel some time ago, and TLC may stand for that (as opposed to The Learning Channel as in the U.S. TLC channel), I think it makes far more sense to have the page named TLC. My proposed target page is currenty a redirect to this article.

NB. I have listed this as a possibly controversial move only because I note it has been the subject of a page move proposal once before. -- Whats new?^(talk) 10:16, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. If it is moved then it needs to be to TLC (Australian TV channel) or something similar. TLC (Australia) is meaningless unless that's what it's actually called. The American channel is at TLC (TV network). -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:54, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support You're right actually, it should be at TLC (Australian TV channel) per WP:MOSTV. -- Whats new?^(talk) 23:53, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No advantage to making this move that I can see. (1) We would lose the current WP:NATURALDIS, (2) We lose some degree of WP:RECOGNIZEability, and (3) I don't think it satisfies MOS:ACRONYM, particularly the line Many acronyms are used for several things; naming a page with the full name helps to avoid clashes. This suggests we should spell it out even if it is more commonly known with the abbreviation. — Amakuru (talk) 10:24, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Since the merger of Travel and Living with Discovery Home and Health the channel has largely moved away from travel programming to more lifestyle and reality series (e.g. Say Yes to the Dress, Kate Plus 8, etc.). As such the channel is no longer an acronym but rather just an international version of the U.S. TLC which too no longer stands for its original acronym. I just haven't proposed the move myself as I haven't found a reference to support such a change in channel direction. Forbesy 777 (talk) 10:43, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support in general as this looks like the new common name, but TLC (TV network) would also have to move.--Cúchullain ^t/c 17:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Non meaningful title for an obscure commercial topic. TLAs are to be avoided. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:44, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-meaningful title? The channel is branded as TLC, uses the same branding and logo as the U.S. TLC channel, and is no longer referred to nor comprises programming relevant to Travel and Living. -- Whats new?^(talk) 05:57, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jargon for an obscure topic. So what do people really call it? A search for sources commenting reveals that this is a non-notable topic that should be deleted. Wikipedia is not a directory of TV channels. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:08, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is referred to as TLC. It was once known as Discovery Travel and Living, as the article itself notes. If you want to go off on a tangent that the entire article is not notable that's a different discussion you can launch elsewhere. -- Whats new?^(talk) 06:14, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Referred by to who? "TLC" is too short. No one would refer to it that way in a context-free introduction. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:55, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tell that to TLC (group), TLC (TV network), TLC (Asia), TLC (UK and Ireland), TLC (TV series). What a bizarre argument. The proposed move is not to a "context-free" location, it is to TLC (Australian TV channel) or TLC (Australia). The context is in the title. -- Whats new?^(talk) 07:27, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"TLC" is your proposed title, the rest is disambiguation. The title is too short. As I said, it is frustrating that there is no real coverage by independent reliable sources to be guided by, and this is a problem with articles that cross the NOTDIRECTORY line. Deletion or merging is usually the solution, not bad titling. The other articles are poorly titled too. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:38, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are sources within all of the articles named TLC including this one. It is hard to see how this page breaches NOTDIRECTORY. Not sure what your apparent bias with three character titles are, but there are literally hundreds of them on Wikpedia. Perhaps you want to rename all of the ABCs as well? -- Whats new?^(talk) 08:04, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move to TLC (Australian TV channel), assuming that it is actually under TLC (TV network) brand umbrella now. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:00, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support move to TLC (Australian TV channel). I've noticed this channel's shift away from its former programming and branding over the years to more closely resemble the American TLC, with much of its content. It no longer brands itself as "Travel and Living" or shows that kind of content (well, maybe perhaps the 'living' part...a little). To have it under the former name still is misleading and frankly, nobody knows it as Travel and Living anymore. Channels rebrand all the time, and they are quite often moved (per Freeform (TV channel) from ABC Family, which I'm sure is still the name it is known as to many people, so the common name argument doesn't always stack up). Also, the article should be rewritten a little when this happens, as its programming is no longer Travel and Living-based and the article still claims it is. Ss 112 16:53, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.