Jump to content

Talk:Subtropical cyclone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSubtropical cyclone has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 11, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Todo

[edit]

More sources. Jdorje 22:08, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quick comment. I think there should be more info on subtropical cyclones outside of the Atlantic basin. After all, Meteo-France in the SWIO officially uses the term, and surely there are other similar types of storms elsewhere around the world (other than the Kona storms, which are already mentioned). Perhaps Cyclone Catarina could be mentioned, as that is a great example of an extratropical storm becoming subtropical, and later tropical, aside from the fact it was an extreme weather anomaly. Is subtropical cyclogenesis any different outside of the Atlantic? --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:54, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have to look up if Meteo France actually maintains a database which includes STs. Their real-time advisories tackle the subject. The problem is, I haven't uncovered any subtropical cyclone-related research that was centered on a basin other than the North Atlantic. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:38, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I just checked their website. Even though everything is in french, it does not appear that they have their database online. A preliminary search for South Indian STs has come up blank, but I'll keep looking. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:11, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for looking. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:54, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Added some text concerning use of subtropical cyclone and characteristics noted throughout the rest of the northern hemisphere. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:55, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Great, I'm happy about that. Do you think it's worth mentioning that hybrid systems occur east of Australia, for example, but aren't warned upon? Likewise with SATL cyclones. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:20, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure that's true. The definition of a tropical cyclone in the southern Pacific does not include warm core...it merely states that the cyclone be synoptic in scale with no frontal boundaries into the center, i.e. not extratropical. Their definition could encompass the ST category...which I think Nadi has warned upon in the past, but Brisbane has not. The 2008 operations plan is open to interpretation...I think it would be considered original research if I included that STs did have advisories near Australia, without the appropriate reference. The WMO document is not enough support, so it seems. Thegreatdr (talk) 01:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I seem to remember reading something by Gary Padgett that ST's weren't warned by Australia, that Hybrids regularly occurred along the east coast but they didn't get warnings... something like that. I'm really not sure, though. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:42, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That was true through 2001, but they recently relaxed the definition to be fairly inclusive, so systems like the March 2001 ST could be warned upon. They wouldn't necessarily be called subtropical, however. This is where the problem lies. Thegreatdr (talk) 04:31, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see. Well, I guess the easiest scenario is just to not mention it, at least until (or if) you find a source that is clearer. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:44, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources being added

[edit]

I'm in favor of leaving both historical types of subtropical cyclones in this article, even though the definition of subtropical cyclone was just changed this past year. Despite the agreed upon change this past spring, it has yet to make the TPC website. Thegreatdr 18:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Once someone adds info about regional names, someone should talk about Kona Lows... Titoxd(?!?) 02:16, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Konas are interesting since some are subtropical cyclones. Many are just occluded cyclones that bring Hawaii rainfall within their trailing cold/stationary frontal boundary. Thegreatdr 19:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea

[edit]

I removed the sentence about Andrea from the history section. This storm forming doesn't contribute anything to the history of storms being classified as subtropical; aside from it forming in May, there's nothing else special about it that isn't covered by one of the existing examples. --Coredesat 05:56, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

neutercane sexist?

[edit]

The article says, "However, when he began issuing public statements during the 1972 Atlantic hurricane season with the term 'neutercane', newspapers protested the term was "sexist". "

I have a feeling that this is a modern spin. The term sounded like a bad pun, that's for sure (like the bad puns about himmicanes that circulated in 1978 when they started using male names for tropical cyclones), and "neutercane" was only used in 1972. But there do not seem to be any news articles or other primary sources from 1972 or any nearby dates calling this term "sexist" (see google news archive and google books). Rather, this story seems to have emerged after the year 2000. Does anyone have an actual source from the period saying that the term was considered sexist, and that this is why it was dropped? Or did it just have too much "giggle factor" as a bad pun? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.148.18.151 (talk) 03:47, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There haven't been any replies with confirmation so I am going to to try to re-work the text of the article. Just to reiterate, newspaper reports from the early 1970s did not call this term sexist. Stories to that effect emerged sometime after the year 2000. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.148.18.151 (talk) 02:55, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Main image

[edit]

An editor replaced the Andrea image with one of Otto in 2010, which would normally be fine. However, the image was one of Otto in its tropical phase. If you are going to replace the main image, please make sure the system is in its subtropical phase. Thank you. Thegreatdr (talk) 22:20, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Subtropical cyclone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:26, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Subtropical_cyclone&oldid=1205494026"