Talk:Stereotypy (non-human)

Equine Low‑importance

	Horses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Veterinary medicine Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veterinary medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Veterinary medicine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veterinary medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Veterinary medicineTemplate:WikiProject Veterinary medicineVeterinary medicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mndo18.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:50, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Hi,

I edited out the reference "Harrison JC, George QF, Cronk CC. Stereotypic behaviour in zoo animals. J Zoo Sc. 2001;1(23):71-86." because to the best of my, and about a half dozen other STEM field academic librarians, it does not exist. The article is not indexed in WorldCat or any subscription database. The authors have no other works. There is no abstract of this article anywhere. It may exist, but I do not think it does, or if it does exist the reference does not lead one to the original source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibmakron (talk • contribs) 20:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Colleague at the San Diego Zoo has suggested that this article is mislabeled, but the information is correct. Correct citation suggested is: Bashaw MJ, Tarou LR, Maki TS, Maple TL. 2001. A survey assessment of variables related to stereotypy in giraffe and okapi. Appl Anim Behav Sci 73:233–245. Ibmakron (talk) 21:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ibmakron. I am the editor who reverted your deletion. That might have been rather a knee-jerk reaction on my part for which I apologise. The content looks accurate (I have worked with zoo animals), although I have reservations about the stated motivation for this (i.e redirected suckling). I also have been unable to track down that article despite 30 mins or so of searching. I suggest I/we re-write that sentence using the Bashaw reference (and there are others relating to giraffes. DrChrissy ^(talk) 21:31, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DrChrissy - no worries. I, and colleague at San Diego Zoo, also did not see anything referring to suckling in the article. I'm a science librarian with a biochemistry background and beyond correcting a faulty citation I should not be an author for this article. I invite you to rewrite the sentence using your best judgementIbmakron (talk) 22:05, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've made edits to the article and added another relevant reference. I've also just re-factored this thread - I hope this is OK. DrChrissy ^(talk) 23:14, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]