This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
St Alkmund's (new) Church, Derby is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
The article on St Alkmund's (new) Church, Derby is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire articles
I've rated this as Stub, because I think it needs quite a lot more before it can be Start class. It's a good idea to reformat your references, so the links don't get broken. There are a few tools that can help with this, like Reflinks. As I explained, I've moved the page to St Alkmund's (new) church. It's always worth checking to see if an article you intend to start is actually already on Wikipedia. That's a lesson for me too! Lastly, I've changed the description of the old church from Georgian to Victorian. All the best with your efforts. KJP1 (talk) 14:52, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
One more thing. I think buildings articles are always improved by a photo. If Commons doesn't have one, Geograph - where I got the one I've used here - is a great source. KJP1 (talk) 14:58, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]