Talk:Spittin' Chiclets

Podcasting Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ice Hockey

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 10:20, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator has indicated on their talk page that they will no longer be pursuing this nomination.

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that an ad read on the podcast Spittin' Chiclets unintentionally sparked a 100 million dollar vodka brand? Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/carolschram/2019/12/18/pink-whitney-scores-for-spittin-chiclets-barstool-sports-and-new-amsterdam-vodka/?sh=7b26cd93721f
- Reviewed: [[]]

Created by Newtothisedit (talk). Self-nominated at 01:24, 24 September 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Hi there, Newtothisedit, and welcome to DYK! Article is new enough and long enough, but I'm afraid the article's sourcing falls short of DYK's reliability standards. I see that the hook is cited to a Forbes contributor – unlike Forbes itself, that would be a WP:RSP no-go. I also don't trust Podbay as a statistics source – I don't see solid evidence of editorial oversight or WP:USEBYOTHERS. The Hustle and theScore.com don't strike me as particularly reliable either, but I won't harangue over that too much. Business Wire is fully a PR source, and I wouldn't count The Equinox as reliable under WP:RSSM. Hopefully that's something we can get fixed up? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 23:08, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
without response, marking for closure :( theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:43, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Newtothisedit: In case you missed this. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:23, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]