Talk:Space Hijackers

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 1, 2005	Peer review	Reviewed
October 18, 2007	Articles for deletion	Deleted

Anarchism

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles

Anarchism WikiProject open tasks
watch · edit · history · talk · purge

Recognized content · Drafts & requests · Subscribe · Member list · Resources · How can I help?

Did you know

15 Nov 2024 – Fagoppositionens Sammenslutning (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion
05 Nov 2024 – 1931 Barcelona rent strike (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Launchballer (t · c); see discussion
25 Oct 2024 – Voltairine de Cleyre (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Grnrchst (t · c); see discussion

Redirects for discussion

07 Nov 2024 – Pauletta Brupbakher (talk · edit · hist) →Paulette Brupbacher was RfDed by Fram (t · c); see discussion

Peer reviews

26 Oct 2024 – Lucy Parsons (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Mujinga (t · c); see discussion

Requested moves

06 Nov 2024 – 2019 Tacoma attack (talk · edit · hist) move request to 2019 Tacoma, Washington attack by Another Believer (t · c) was moved to 2019 Tacoma immigration detention center attack (talk · edit · hist) by Robertsky (t · c) on 13 Nov 2024; see discussion

Articles for creation

01 Oct 2024 – Draft:Donat Cherepanov (talk · edit · hist) submitted for AfC by Speedymagoo (t · c) was moved to Donat Cherepanov (talk · edit · hist) by Soman (t · c) on 15 Nov 2024
25 Mar 2024 – Draft:Anarres (talk · edit · hist) submitted for AfC by Teeg123 (t · c) was accepted to Anarres (talk · edit · hist) by Asilvering (t · c) on 13 Nov 2024

Cleanup (0) · Potentially related articles · Recent edits · Recent Commons images · Stub expansion project (513)

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Advertisement?

This page seems like it is an advertisement for a group called "Space Hijackers". It is not written from a NPOV - see "who battle to save our streets"; "the evils of Urban Architects"

Does this article belong here? Does it just jeed to be cleaned up? Is thiis valid?

Posted by: SSherris 20:57, 18 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Rather agree with you but, for the moment, have made it rather more NPOV than it was and added some wikilinks to make more sense of it. --VampWillow 00:48, 31 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

As it is, this article doesn't provide much useful information and isn't very encyclopedic at all. It does indeed seem to serve primarily as a tool to advertise the group's existence. I suppose it could be edited into a better article in the future, though. Mr. Billion 04:57, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I don't get it.

What is this group about then? They are anti-buildings? This is a very badly written article. I don't feel I've learnt anything from it.

They're known in some circles for their antics, the article should stay, though be improved. They are not anti-buildings, but rather anti-being-controlled. Against being told what to do by design, which extends to active protest against a number of things which may incidentally have a political edge (e.g. ban on protests within 1 mile of parliament). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 161.73.37.81 (talk) 11:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]