Talk:Soviet destroyer Smyshlyony (1940)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 07:30, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Claim my seat here. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 07:30, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- refugees and bombarded Axis troop positions Link Axis.
- Done
- Smyshleny struck a Soviet mine on 6 March 1942 and sank Link Soviet Union.
- Excessive, already in infobox
- I think we should link the Soviet Union in the lead too.
- Done.
- Smyshleny (Russian: Смышлёный, lit. 'Clever') Unlink Russian.
- Done
- displacing 1,727 metric tons (1,700 long tons) at standard load Link both tonnes.
- Done
- and 2,279 metric tons (2,243 long tons) at deep load Link deep load.
- Done
- designers expected would exceed the 37-knot (69 km/h; 43 mph) speed Link knots here.
- Done
- Anti-aircraft defense/AA guns is overlinked.
- Done
- Anti-aircraft defense was provided by a pair of Add "(AA)" after Anti-aircraft.
- Done
- as well as four 12.7-millimeter (0.50 in) DK or DShK machine guns round the in here.
- Done
- No commissioned part in the body?
- 'Accepted' in the body is one of several Russian equivalents to commissioned
- Infobox says 8 March while the body says 7 March?
- Done
- Odessa is overlinked.
- Done
- in response to a report of Romanian destroyers leaving the port Pipe Romanian with the Kingdom of Romania.
- Linked to a more relevant article instead
- the German invasion of the Soviet Union, on 22 June 1941 Pipe German with Nazi Germany.
- That would be overlinking, Germany is too well known.
- Not Nazi Germany. I do not think that former countries should be included in this rule. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 14:00, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Done.
- No OR.
Infobox
- "1,727 t (1,700 long tons)" Link both tonnes.
- "54,000 shp (40,000 kW)" Link kW.
- Both done
Images
- File:Unidentified Project 7U in the Black Sea.jpg This is strange since when had the US soldiers in the Black Sea in WWII?
- Likely taken by US naval attache
Sources
- Looks good to me they're also reliable and academic.
That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 19:32, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
- I think I'll pass it. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 20:10, 20 September 2019 (UTC)