Talk:Somerton Man

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Somerton Man article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2: 365 days

Somerton Man was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 20, 2009	Good article nominee	Not listed
August 9, 2015	Good article nominee	Not listed

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 1, 2012, December 1, 2013, December 1, 2015, and December 1, 2018.

Current status: Former good article nominee

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Australia: Adelaide / Crime Low‑importance

	Australia portal Somerton Man is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Adelaide (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian crime (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

October 19 to 25, 2014 (17th)

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Dave Stopera (2014-10-22). "21 Wikipedia Pages That Will Make It Impossible For You To Sleep". BuzzFeed.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

‎Daniel Connell, The War at Home: Australia 1939–1949, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Crow's Nest, NSW, 1988, ISBN 0-642-53054-8.
Richard Walker, Curtin's Cowboys: Australia's Secret Bush Commandos, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, 1986, ISBN 0-86861-765-2.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Haplogroup H (mtDNA)#H4, H7 and H13|haplogroup H4a1a1a]] The anchor (#H4, H7 and H13) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

"Tamam Shud" in the Bible: A Link to John 19:30 in the Somerton Man Case

The phrase "Tamam Shud," meaning "It is finished" in Persian, relates to John 19:30 in the Bible. The complete verse states, "When he had received the drink, Jesus said, 'It is finished' " (“Tamam Shud”), marking the end of his mission before his death.

In the context of the crucifixion, Jesus was offered vinegar (or sour wine) to drink as he hung on the cross. In John 19:28-30, the passage reads:

19:28 Later, knowing that everything had now been finished, and so that Scripture would be fulfilled, Jesus said, 'I am thirsty.'

19:29 A jar of wine vinegar was there, so they soaked a sponge in it, put the sponge on a stalk of the hyssop plant, and lifted it to Jesus' lips.

19:30 When he had received the drink, Jesus said, 'It is finished.' With that, he bowed his head and gave up his spirit.

In Persian Contemporary Bible (PCB), John 19:30 reads:

وقتی عیسی چشید، فرمود: «تمام شد!» و سر خود را پایین انداخت و روح خود را تسلیم کرد.

Vaghti 'Isa cheshid, farmud: "Tamam shud!" va sar khod ra payin andakht va rooh khod ra tasleem kard.

Is there a possible connection between "Tamam Shud" and John 19:30 in the Somerton Man case? 2001:9E8:198C:4600:28A2:BE94:3B57:1278 (talk) 12:14, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase is used at the end of the FitzGerald translation of the Rubaiyat, a scrap of which was found in the Somerton Man's pocket. I wouldn't know whether the phrase is typically used to mark the end of works of Persian literature and the resemblance to John 19:30 is purely coincidental, or whether FitzGerald was perhaps indirectly referencing the Gospel of John, but I'm sure some other Wikipedian can enlighten us. Muzilon (talk) 21:09, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Attempt to decode"

I know exactly what that fragment of "coded" letters means. Not the individual letters, of course not. But at a higher level. And yes, fully aware that that makes me sound like any number of whack jobs. To whom should I pass on my "theory"? This place right here on Wikipedia doesnt seem like the right one. 2001:8003:E40F:9601:58A5:75DA:4526:F50E (talk) 02:48, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We are not interested in what you claim to believe. We want your sources. If they are independent secondary sources, we may consider using them, so please provide them right here. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 02:55, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You could contact the Australian police who might be interested. Also, there are some cryptography websites out there like [1]https://ciphermysteries.com/ or [2]https://scienceblogs.de/klausis-krypto-kolumne/ whose authors could listen to you, or if you think a scientific article is warranted, Cryptologia magazine might be your best bet. ([3]) --Syzygy (talk) 09:31, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]