Talk:Socratea exorrhiza
 | A fact from Socratea exorrhiza appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 October 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
We should have a new category for this and the venus fly trap
[edit]This plant is awesome, it 'walks'. We should have a category for this and the Venus Fly Trap and other plants which have the ability to move in a unique way.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Klichka (talk • contribs) 13:58, 3 July 2007
This plant does *not* move. [1]
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.74.120.224 (talk) 03:55, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Just to note, an old version of the article did state that the tree could "walk" to lighter areas of the forest but this appears to have been WP:MADEUP as I couldn't find any sources to back it up. Smartse (talk) 13:42, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
More epiphyte info
[edit]Long-term changes of the vascular epiphyte assemblage on the palm Socratea exorrhiza in a lowland forest in Panama
Other names
[edit]1) pachuba (Bol), paxiúba (Bra), zancona(Col), bombón (Ecu). jira (Pan), cashapona(Per), macanilla(Ven), http://www.fao.org/docrep/x0451e/x0451e08.htm SmartSE (talk) 01:01, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/31877#page/169/mode/1up SmartSE (talk) 23:40, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Deleted unpublished results
[edit]I cut the sentence
In a forthcoming paper awaiting publication in Nature, Snow and Raines 2010 proved finally that the trees do not in fact walk, based on hours of observational research and comparative studies of thousands of trees. [1]
as Wikipedia content must be externally verifiable. The citation number given did not refer to a 2010 Nature paper, but rather to Goldsmith 2007. No such paper has not appeared in Nature as of May 2011; if it has appeared elsewhere, or if it appears in the future, feel free to add it back in with the correct citation.
Gould363 (talk) 03:21, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
As a followup, "Snow and Raines" sound somewhat contrived. A Google search for this pair did not return any related to the sciences. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gpronger (talk • contribs) 00:44, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Socratea exorrhiza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090901184608/http://videos.howstuffworks.com:80/hsw/10146-useful-plants-cashapona-socratea-exorrhiza-video.htm to http://videos.howstuffworks.com/hsw/10146-useful-plants-cashapona-socratea-exorrhiza-video.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC)