Talk:Socialist Unity Party (disambiguation)
Appearance
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 31 March 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved as unopposed. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Socialist Unity Party → Socialist Unity Party (disambiguation) – The Socialist Unity Party of Germany is the clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for 'Socialist Unity Party', and as such the latter should be turned into a redirect pointing towards the former. The disambiguation page would simply be mentioned in a hatnote. Loytra (talk) 13:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). — Amakuru (talk) 14:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Natg 19 (talk) 22:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Primary topic grabs are, by definition, not uncontroversial. 162 etc. (talk) 01:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- According to what policy? If something is very clearly the primary topic, I'm not at all sure why a move would be considered contested or controversial. Loytra (talk) 02:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Socialist Unity Party has gone from primary redirect to dabpage, then back to primary redirect, then back to dabpage. See WP:RMCM: "A move is potentially controversial if (...) there has been any past debate about the best title for the page; someone could reasonably disagree with the move." 162 etc. (talk) 04:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I accept that. Guess I'll just start a regular move request then? Loytra (talk) 12:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Socialist Unity Party has gone from primary redirect to dabpage, then back to primary redirect, then back to dabpage. See WP:RMCM: "A move is potentially controversial if (...) there has been any past debate about the best title for the page; someone could reasonably disagree with the move." 162 etc. (talk) 04:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- According to what policy? If something is very clearly the primary topic, I'm not at all sure why a move would be considered contested or controversial. Loytra (talk) 02:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Primary topic grabs are, by definition, not uncontroversial. 162 etc. (talk) 01:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - @Loytra and 162 etc.: discusssion started, and the previous discusison copied. — Amakuru (talk) 14:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- For some reason this didn't send me a notification, so I didn't see it until now. In any case, thank you! Loytra (talk) 16:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.