Talk:Sleeping Beauties (novel)

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 19 February 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Film is moved, novel is not moved. Dab page will be the base name for now - i.e. redirect to Sleeping Beauty (disambiguation) — Amakuru (talk) 14:26, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

– Novel has received more views than the short film. Either the novel or the dabpage should take over the base name. George Ho (talk) 07:49, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support 2nd, neutral on 1st. The novel gets 11,746 views compared with only 1,880 for the film but PT swaps can cause problems but there are only 2 topics here. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support 2nd, but prefer redirecting Sleeping Beauties to dab. Yes, the novel gets more views than the film, but the novel is much more recent, so I expect the difference to smooth out over time. (The novel is also apparently going to be adapted to a TV series, which will further complicate the PT picture when it comes out). Colin M (talk) 19:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Reception Link

I notice that the reception link that is supposed to go to bookmarks go to the page for a completely different book, namely

https://bookmarks.reviews/reviews/milkman/

I don't know if this was an accident (if someone was copy-pasting too many links from bookmarks and got them mixed up) or intentional (if someone was trying to boost the number of links to that other book, maybe for SEO reasons), but either way, the link probably should be

https://bookmarks.reviews/reviews/sleeping-beauties/ 24.52.124.254 (talk) 21:12, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure looks like you are right. Feel free to fix the link and reference title. -2pou (talk) 22:39, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]