Talk:Silver Hill Mine

Silver Hill Mine has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 3, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

A fact from Silver Hill Mine appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 April 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that some Confederate bullets were sourced from a silver mine?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Silver Hill Mine.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 18:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Washington Mine, 1845

... that a silver mine (pictured) produced bullets for the Confederacy? Source: https://www.mininghistoryassociation.org/Journal/MHJ-v16-2009-Kaas.pdf pp. 37-38
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sagyo Thu-Myat

Moved to mainspace by Generalissima (talk). Self-nominated at 09:41, 24 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Silver Hill Mine; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Length, date, close paraphrase check ok. Regarding the hook, arguably the mine supplier raw material for bullets produced at another site. Also, the Confederated States of America should be linked, "the Confederacy" might have different meanings for people outside the US. How about ALT1 - ...that silver from Silver Hill Mine (pictured), the first silver mine in the U.S., was used for Confederate bullets during the American Civil War? --Soman (talk) 11:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- That's more accurate, but I think too long to be punchy - I like to try to keep my hooks as short as possible. What about ALT2 ... that some Confederate bullets were sourced from a silver mine? (pictured) Generalissima (talk) 16:34, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - That works very well, on ALT2 --Soman (talk) 09:18, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General geology

There does not seem to be anything on the general geology of the region. Cheers, · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 12:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, was late last night when I finished. Added some geology information. Generalissima (talk) Generalissima (talk) 18:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. — ♠Ixtal ^{( T / C )} ⁂ Non nobis solum. ♠ 01:46, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Silver Hill Mine/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ixtal (talk · contribs) 02:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful. I usually review section by section for grammar and source issues as I read, then provide general comments on the whole article. Please use {{done}} to indicate when feedback has been addressed. I encourage you to debate if you find any feedback you disagree with. If I do not answer within 48 hours, please {{ping}} me. I am quite a forgetful editor and it is likely I forgot to get back to you. — ♠Ixtal ^{( T / C )} ⁂ Non nobis solum. ♠ 02:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Lead+Infobox

Infobox image: I would consider editing the Commons image to a cropped version without the margins so that the image is more readable. It would also make it easier to read the names of the various shafts mentioned in the Company section.
- Fixed. - G

Background

I would consider moving the table to below the first paragraph so there's no big white space as there is now due to the infobox length.
- Fixed. - G
The Davidson County, North Carolina wl might best be displayed as just Davidson County, as there is no other davidson county in the Carolinas and the Carolinas are already mentioned in the same sentence.
- Fixed. - G
Roughly 200 feet - Perhaps here I'd write "While roughly 200 feet [...]" or something along those lines to ease the sentence into all the numbers. Nothing wrong with the sentence itself I just had to read it twice over to understand it so a word like "while" to introduce the first sentence in the compound could help readers

understand.

- Fixed. - G
Same comment about Cabarrus County as above
- Also fixed. - G

Washington Mining Company

each able to smelt a ton of lead - I would say "one" instead of "a" to make it clear you are referring to the measurement rather than the expression "a ton of" meaning "a lot".
- Fixed. - G
In the Philadelphia shipping paragraph you say "lead pigs" and "pig lead" -- is there a difference between the two terms or do they refer to the same thing?
- Pig lead is the lead that comprises lead pigs. I just dropped the pig from "pig lead" since its not a needed clarification. - G
Lead was shipped for processing at Philadelphia. This sentence feels redundant.
- Dropped it. -G

Zinc and Silver Mining Company

have continued the Fall of Petersburg - Continued until?
- Fixed. - G

Copyright Violations

Copyvios Detector detects no likely copyright violations.
- Ah, let me add some in. - G

General thoughts

Honestly this is a great article. Only very minor things to address. I'll go over the sources now but expect no surprises there. Is there a reason why some of the images in the Kaas source, for example, can't be added to the article as well?

- Added another image from Kaas, good point. - G

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.