Jump to content

Talk:Silk Way Airlines Flight 995

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeSilk Way Airlines Flight 995 was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 7, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 6, 2013.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that several attempts to get to the wreckage of an Azeri aircraft (pictured) that crashed near Kabul in 2011 were repelled by gunshots?

Archived references not used (yet) in the article

[edit]

--Jetstreamer Talk 21:53, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2011 Silk Way Airlines Ilyushin Il-76 crash/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Retrolord (talk · contribs) 13:12, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have reviewed the nomination and failed it. Please address the problems before reonimating. Thanks, ★★RetroLord★★ 13:12, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

" informed that the" That doesn't flow very well, could you change that please?

"18 tonnes (18 long tons; 20 short tons)" Can we have a different measurement set-up thing here?

" with base in Bagram" Poor grammar, please change

"at the airport of destination" A bit redundant/unneccessary

"3,500-metre" 3,500 metres

"broke up in 10 to 20 pieces" That doesn't flow very well, can you change it please

"Parvand Province" Why does this link to Parwan province instead?

" Despite a British Major, who was the spokesman for the coalition forces led by the United States in Afghanistan, confirming that no activity from the rebels had been registered in the area of the crash at the time the accident took place,[1] several attempts to reach the crash site were repelled by gunshots" Poor grammar, the sentence is too long, and the second half seems irrelevant

""almost impossible" to be carried out" Redundant 'be' and it needs a citation as its a direct quote

"that the Talibans" Taliban is not pluralised

Sorry, but the above comments/concerns are not sufficient reason to fail the nomination, as they can be easily assessed. What kind of reviewer are you? I'll be raising this matter at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles.--Jetstreamer Talk 20:51, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, what kind of reviewer am I. While your at it, report me to arbcom and to the UN, the CIA too.

Further that, what kind of nominator are YOU, if you haven't bothered to proofread before submitting this drivel. ★★RetroLord★★ 20:53, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you did not notice it, the article went through a previous review when it was passed for a DYK.--Jetstreamer Talk 20:57, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Just incase you didn't notice, I don't have much tolerance for people who cannot be bothered proof reading before submitting to WP:GAN. As noted above, report me to the UN please, I think your human rights may have been violated. ★★RetroLord★★ 20:58, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on 2011 Silk Way Airlines Ilyushin Il-76 crash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Silk_Way_Airlines_Flight_995&oldid=1210377788"