Talk:Siege of Hama (2011)

A news item involving Siege of Hama (2011) was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 3 August 2011.

Wikipedia

WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS

The article Siege of Hama (2011), along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:

Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.

Remedy instructions and exemptions

Enforcement procedures:

Violations of any restrictions (excluding 1RR/reverting violations) and other conduct issues should be reported to the administrators' incidents noticeboard. Violations of revert restrictions should be reported to the administrators' edit warring noticeboard.
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.

With respect to any reverting restrictions:

Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

Sources

Just some more sources to work with. --Rowboatcop (talk) 16:28, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Title

The title of this article hardly seems like WP:NPOV, and I'm not sure it's WP:COMMON either. I think it should probably be changed to something less inflammatory. -Kudzu1 (talk) 18:10, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Hama uprising has occurred since July 3, so we could call it the 2011 Hama uprising.213.81.122.138 (talk) 08:18, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the template in use on all the articles, which I've reproduced to the right, it seems fairly consistent with the current articles. Unless of course they are all merged into a larger article, something like:

or "Timeline" instead of List, etc. Something that follows along with Timeline of the 2011 Syrian uprising. 99.146.122.70 (talk) 12:13, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Military infobox

The military infobox implies that the opposition is armed, and this is absolutely not proved. SyHaBi (talk) 10:43, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some stone throwers, but that's about all.86.26.72.144 (talk) 12:55, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stone throwers don't constitute an armed force so I think we should replace the military infobox by a civilian attack infobox. SyHaBi (talk) 13:30, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK.86.26.72.144 (talk) 16:42, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ramadan massacre and Deir ez-Zor

It seems this is a WP:SYNTH to include Deir ez-Zor within this article and limit it to just August 01st Hama events. The issue is supposed to be the blockade of Hama city ("Siege of Hama" per [1]) for the last month and a half [2]. The siege currently escalated into the ongoing massacre, but the "Ramadan massacre" is a sub event of the prolonging Hama blockade. We can split "Ramadan massacre" into a sub-article, but that is not the main issue here. Here are sources on the Siege of Hama:
June 2011: [3]
July 2011: [4], [5], [6], [7]
August 2011: [8].Greyshark09 (talk) 20:28, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell the seage started on July 8 or 3 depending on the source used, Al Jezerra and the Daily Telegraph (UK) apear to be the most WP:RS to date.82.11.98.131 (talk) 09:33, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Info-burst

I added much stuff to it today!82.2.78.26 (talk) 09:06, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen, great job! Brightgalrs (/braɪtˈɡæl.ərˌɛs/)^[1] 01:25, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Free Syrian Army

Come on people, it's december now and the Free Syrian Army is now operating in Hama, Ambushing goverment troops that are shooting the unarmed demonstrators. The article is outdated and maybe this article should be changed a bit now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goltak (talk • contribs) 19:03, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scope of this article

It needs to be made clear what this article is about.
Is it about Hama city only or is it about Hama Governorate?
Is it about all protests and violence since the beginning or is it only about clashes between the SA & FSA?
Whenever that's decided, it should be made clear and all off-topic information should be removed. ~Asarlaí 07:45, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, there is a lot of confusion in Syria related articles between governorates and their capital cities. However, i think that instead of removing the irelevant info to be moved into other articles. "Siege" in general is a siege of a city, not a huge province.

This article should concentrate on the July-August 2011 siege of Hama, the rest is pretty much detouched from the issue in time and place. We should split one or several articles. Ideas?Greyshark09 (talk) 11:25, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, the article needs to be rewritten to focus on the event from July to August of last year, which has ended. And maybe a new article started up to cover the wider events in the province that are happening right now. EkoGraf (talk) 03:17, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Split

I request quest that we split this page into Siege of Hama (2011), and 2011 - 2012 Hama Province Clashes. This would fit in with this article now focusing on 2011 siege. Naming it Hama Province clashes would cover Hama city and other Hama province cities like Halfaya, Tayyibat al Imam, and Qallat al Madiq. Please vote on this below. I feel that this will reach a consensus. Jacob102699 (talk) 22:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support - if you mean splitting 2011-2012 Hama Governorate clashes from this page.Greyshark09 (talk) 13:10, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Siege of Hama (2011). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:59, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UN Resolution

I do not find any resolution mentioned in the article. It says: "UN The Security Council passed a resolution that "condemns widespread violations of human rights and the use of force against civilians by the Syrian authorities." on 4 August." What is the number of resolution? Ksanyi (talk) 09:43, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]