User talk:Jacob102699

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Jacob102699! Thank you for your contributions. I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Marek.69 ^talk 05:42, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Egyptian revolution

Hi Jacob, thanks for all your good work!

Could you please explain your last edit to 2011 Egyptian revolution (revision 462411914)? As you are probably aware, ClueBot reverted both that edit and the one you'd made earlier; you may wish to restore the changes made in that earlier edit.

Writing a short edit comment can help other editors know what your intentions were; using "Show changes" can help you spot changes you may have missed.

Thanks for helping to keep Wikipedia awesome! --pmj (talk) 21:14, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:2012 insurgency in northern Mali, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Shriram (talk) 11:58, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coud you use your sandbox to test/figure otu whats wrong, bec ause these massive removals remove information (even when partly restored) and ona current mainspace article its doenst help ;)Lihaas (talk) 09:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Jacob102699. You have new messages at Shriram's talk page.
Message added 12:13, 2 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Shriram (talk) 12:13, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:39, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Binnish

Wikipedia does not have a category named Category:2011-2012 Syrian Uprising, as you can see by the fact that it's a redlink. You need to either find and use the correct category name, or leave the tag alone until somebody else does; an article is not allowed to be left sitting in a nonexistent category. Bearcat (talk) 22:24, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. When you recently edited April 2012 Idlib Governorate Operation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Ford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnastar

Thank you! :D And I responded on the Syria uprising talk page about the casualty numbers. Ya I misunderstood your intention so I'm sorry about that. :) EkoGraf (talk) 16:08, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Syria

Please don't change the lede in the way you did. You replaced the majority of the lede with sectarian stuff, nullifying a lede constructed by mass discussion in the talk page. Sopher99 (talk) 23:00, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean I changed the lead? I just added ceasefire to infobox. Jacob102699 (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2011–2012_Syrian_uprising&diff=487577135&oldid=487570597 No hard feelings, but this says otherwise. Sopher99 (talk) 00:09, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It seems it got accidentally shuffled around. That's weird, I don't know how that happened. Sorry, Jacob102699 (talk) 00:14, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how accidental it was considering that new sentences were formed and individual sections relocated but whatever, I'm not out to prosecute. Sopher99 (talk) 00:18, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I already added the kofi annan ceasefire to the box, we don't need an additional box, also ill revert the lede. Sopher99 (talk) 01:25, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah

Agreed, I see you already posted the complaint at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/ChronicalUsual/Archive#Clerk.2C_CheckUser.2C_and.2For_patrolling_admin_comments_5

Go on the page's history and request a checkuser from the users that perform checkusers.

Sopher99 (talk) 20:04, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In re. Chronicalusual

Hi Jacob, unfortunately I'm terribly busy in real life at the moment, so I cannot properly investigate the users you have reported on my talk page. I'm sorry, but I have to refer you to WP:SPI. Again, I apologise. Cheers. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 09:19, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hama bombing

Ya seems like it, I think for the sake of neutrality we should classify it as artillery attack or bomb explosion accident, in essence both, we shouldn't exclude one for the other. One of the reasons too I think this is the proper course of action is because up to this point I have never seen this many claimed fatalities from one artillery attack, so I think there is some creedence to the claim about a bomb factory accident, and I realy don't see at this point why the military would use a SCUD, that would be major overkill even for them. EkoGraf (talk) 21:29, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chronical

I think its the bahrain guy. The bahrain guy uses multiple ip addresses and edited the same pages chronical was editing. The bronx guy only showed up 10 days ago with a minor complaint, and after i originally turned down his complaint, he made an account. Eventually I fixed his complaint when I realized it was I who was really mistaken, then the bronx guy stopped editing. Chronicalusual uses a proxy server, meaning we can never truly ban him. Sopher99 (talk) 23:43, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gk007/SWTOR

Did you know that Star Wars:TOR has it's own wiki!? I encourage you to help us improve it! You may contact me directly for an editor account or request on on the login page! Thanks! — T13 ( C • M • Click to learn how to view this signature as intended ) 15:42, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's recently been brought to my attention that my previous post on the subject may be viewed as spam. I apologize if you feel that this is the case; however, I was just trying to inform the people using the userbox that are obviously very interested in Star Wars:TOR that the is a specialized wiki designed for that purpose and that, like all wikis, user participation is always welcomed and appreciated. Do with this information what you may, and may the force be with you. — T13 ( C • M • Click to learn how to view this signature as intended ) 16:35, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fayetteville, Arkansas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White Rock, Arkansas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Feedback Tool update

Hey Jacob102699. I'm contacting you because you're involved in the Article Feedback Tool in some way, either as a previous newsletter recipient or as an active user of the system. As you might have heard, a user recently anonymously disabled the feedback tool on 2,000 pages. We were unable to track or prevent this due to the lack of logging feature in AFT5. We're deeply sorry for this, as we know that quite a few users found the software very useful, and were using it on their articles.

We've now re-released the software, with the addition of a logging feature and restrictions on the ability to disable. Obviously, we're not going to automatically re-enable it on each article—we don't want to create a situation where it was enabled by users who have now moved on, and feedback would sit there unattended—but if you're interested in enabling it for your articles, it's pretty simple to do. Just go to the article you want to enable it on, click the "request feedback" link in the toolbox in the sidebar, and AFT5 will be enabled for that article.

Again, we're very sorry about this issue; hopefully it'll be smooth sailing after this :). If you have any questions, just drop them at the talkpage. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) 21:44, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Title change ‘Siege of Homs’

Dear colleague, on ‘Talk:Siege of Homs#Change of title: ‘War in Homs’ or ‘Civil war in Homs’ or ‘Syrian Civil War in Homs’’, I’ve started a discussion in which you might take some interest. Yours sincerely, Corriebertus (talk) 14:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 18 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Red discography page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fayetteville High School (Arkansas), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Louis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]