Talk:Sheffield district rail rationalisation plan of the 1960s

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sheffield, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sheffield on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SheffieldWikipedia:WikiProject SheffieldTemplate:WikiProject SheffieldSheffield articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Sheffield district rail rationalisation plan of the 1960s is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I've just pruned this a bit, copy-edited and rewritten after Captain Scarlet's major re-write - IMHO the bit about Victoria's light fittings is maybe straying a little to far into trivia - I know it's from Batty's book!

With regard to Masboro' Freightliner terminal does anyone have any more info on this? Batty mentions it very briefly but does not expand, the terminal wasn't there (and there was no sign of it) by the 1980s. I'm wary of what I'm putting here with regards to WP:No original research, however if Batty said it existed and then it suddenly it didn't at a time when most other cities had freightliner terminls (BR started culling them mid-1980s), we can deduce that it closed at some point prior to then and therefore wasn't that succesful!

By the way the 10% figure is mentioned in the BBC documentary Engines must not enter the potato siding which is downloadable. I'll try to work out what the proper wiki format is for references to video media files.

BaseTurnComplete 14:20, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Sheffield district rail rationalisation plan of the 1960s/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Switch existing references to use one of the {{Cite}} templates
Requires copy edit for WP:MOS

Keith D (talk) 14:16, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 14:16, 11 May 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 05:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sheffield district rail rationalisation plan of the 1960s. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071008203053/http://www.railcons.com/millhouses.shtml to http://www.railcons.com/millhouses.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]