This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
It's hard to get information on significant publishers once they become imprints of larger publishers, and harder still when they are not a web presence like so many modern businesses; for anyone not familiar with this publisher, rest assured, they have a permanent place in the pantheon of religious/spiritual book publishers. if Pokemon can have 8,000 articles devoted to each whisker on each creature, then this publisher must stay. I WILL try to flesh it out some more: (note that I am not the creator of this article) I really hope we can move towards acknowledging the role of publishers like this. if you do a search for shambhala publications, or shambhala, youll probably find, i would guess, at least a few hundred links to REFERENCES in WP (hey, I nailed it: I just did the search and 419 incidents found!). I think every publisher whose books are used significantly as reference material on WP should have at least a stub. I know the books themselves are the most critical to have articles on, but publishers like this are not just businesses, but collectors of knowledge. so please, please please dont delete this. I already had a stub article on sierra club books deleted (merged), which I will try to recreate when I have more refs: without these publishers, wikipedia would absolutely not exist!Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:51, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
