Talk:Seven Second Summits

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[continent#Number of continents|seven continents]] The anchor (#Number of continents) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climbing Low‑importance

	Climbing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climbing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climbing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ClimbingWikipedia:WikiProject ClimbingTemplate:WikiProject ClimbingClimbing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Untitled

Has anyone actually completed this list, or even seriously attempted it? I don't know of anyone who has stated this as a goal. If possible, the article should say one way or the other. -- Spireguy (talk) 18:09, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You know, now that I look more carefully at this page, it seems that the unique source of the list is Peak Bagger. The only other source that mentions the idea of grouping these summits together at all is Into Thin Air---did Krakauer actually specifically list them all? My point is that the paucity of reliable sources addressing this topic specifically calls the notability of the topic into question. Without more sources, should the article remain? I'm not going to request deletion, but I do want to call this to people's attention. -- Spireguy (talk) 01:25, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With today's news that Christian Stangl has summited K2, he's very close to be the first to climb all Seven Second Summits. Only Mount Tyree in Antarctica remains - which Stangl is scheduled to climb in November. See his website http://www.skyrunning.at/ Cl2kliss (talk) 16:52, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He has since admitted that his claim of summitting K2 was false and he has yet to climb Mount Tyree. However, since someone is actually trying to accomplish this feat, I would say this supports, and I recommend, keeping the article. Racerx11 (talk) 03:57, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List may be incorrect

The thorough people at peaklist.org consider Puncak Mandala (aka Juliana Peak) to be 4760 m high, rather than the 4701 m given in our wikipedia article. This would make it loftier than Puncak Trikora (aka Mt Wilhelmina), in wikipedia listed as 7450 m. Peaklist's estimate is based on (enhanced) SRTM data, which (unenhanced) shows in for example google terrain view. Click your way to the closest terrain view of those two peaks (I've corrected the coordinates on both sites) and you'll see that the highest contours around the old queen's peak (Trikura) are only 4680 m and those around the younger queen's peak (Mandala) are 4720 m. Unless a peak is a spire, the contours tend to be on average 40 m below the summit. Trikura doesn't look very sharp, and it may be only around 4720 rather than the advertised 4750 m. Mandala is more isolated and harder to approach (it will take a few weeks) than Trikura, so this may not be welcome news for would be second summit ascenders. Check for example here for an account on how hard it is to get to Mandala; this site also lists reasonable heights of 4760 m for Mandala and 4730 for Trikura (the climber planned to climb both). Afasmit (talk) 00:47, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Mandala site above is part of the "Gunung Bagging" site, which has a list of highest >1000 m prominent mountains in Indonesia, where Mandala indeed appears above Trikora. Afasmit (talk) 23:00, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peakbagger.com also lists it at 4760 m [1] so you may be on to something. I for one would support the change if you want to move that direction. I dont know if you want get more sources confirming it, maybe get another opinion or two from other editors, or just go ahead and be bold and make the change and see if it sails. Either or is fine with me.--Racerx11 (talk) 02:51, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just ran across this [2] and this [3]. This puts another wrinkle into things eh?--Racerx11 (talk) 04:18, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually this may be nothing. This peak, Ngga Pulu, lies very close to Puncak Jaya, on the same ridge I think. Therfore it is likely it lacks significant prominence and may be just a subsidiary top. If so it can be ignored in a list such as this.--Racerx11 (talk) 04:44, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've created a List of highest mountains of New Guinea. Outrageous amount of work, but perhaps with the help of Viewfinder and other experts it can become the standard list for Australasia / Oceania, as he and I seem to have done with the list of highest mountains. In that case the "seven second summits" people will eventually follow suit ;-) Afasmit (talk) 10:54, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good work on the list! Very well done.--Racerx11 (talk) 01:42, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For information: I agree with the claim that Mandala is higher than Trikora although the evidence is not 100% conclusive. I am working a new DEM of Indonesia and New Guinea, bringing together the best information from SRTM, ASTER GDEM and topographic mapping. I will post it to my site in about a week. Summit lists may follow. Viewfinder (talk) 21:32, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]