Talk:SeaTwirl

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 September 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

There are four independent references in this article which are not connected to the SeaTwirl entity and which provide somewhat reliable info on the concept : NyTeknik, Main(e), GoodEnvironment and GizMag. None of them confirm independently that the SeaTwirl has stored energy using seawater.

None of the previous references confirm independently that the prototype was succesful or comparatively cheap, so I had to dig up the Main(e) ref which simply says succesful but does not say whether that is an independent confirmation or merely a rehash of SeaTwirl statement. For now, we must take Main(e)s word for it.

EWEA is the publisher, not the author, and should be put after the title similar to the other refs. The word "seatwirl" no longer produces hits on Chalmers. TGCP (talk) 19:34, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

in my opionion there is a huge probability that SeaTwirl is a scam, they provide no real scientific datas and they made so much ads on the internet 78.227.78.135 (talk) 21:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on SeaTwirl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110726063132/http://www.stingday.se/SV/39/medverkande-innovationsbolag to http://www.stingday.se/SV/39/medverkande-innovationsbolag

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]