Talk:Scadoxus puniceus
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Reliable sources
[edit]Please see WP:RS. There is no requirement for a reliable source to be available online; books are fine as sources. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:38, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Well, it SHOULD be a requirement when challenged, lest enormous inaccuracies be perpetuated without the possibility of being reviewed. Paul venter (talk) 07:05, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- It would be silly for WP editors only to be able to use books or journals which are available online — many important plant sources aren't. For example, Cactus couldn't be written without Anderson's massive book, which is the cactus reference. Books can be checked by other editors if necessary; they are available in libraries. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:45, 17 January 2014 (UTC)